Imagine that you are in the classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader say something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best to do?
1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away;
2. Wait until the class or meeting us over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader;
3. Say nothing.
Every society has its own standards of behavior which are indeed the way to react in some certain difficult situations. If I attended in a meeting or lecture and found out that the speaker says something seems to be wrong I could choose a safety solution in which I would wait to meet him or her in person at the end of the event to discuss about the problems.
First of all, even we are on the way of globalization in which human could share the same standard of behavior, there is a group of reactions not to be accepted. One of them is the impoliteness. It is certainly the fact that during the meeting or lecture, the speaker should be treat with a highest respect. The presentation often occurs under his/her control. Indeed, there was usually a manifesto hidden behind what we hear. In some cases, the mistake is one of the treats used to attract audience’s attention. It might be a controlled example to show the contraction or the comparison of the subjects focused on. It is so rude to interrupt the speaker immediately. Even worse, what if my opinion goes wrong? This accident could affect my reputation terribly. Waiting until the end of the time then discussing with the speaker about my questions seems to be an appropriate option. The solution ensures the reputation for both of I and the speaker.
On another hand, I might have no idea of the speaker with whom I were going to dealing. Lacking of information about him/her could lead the situation to an accident. For example, if the speaker had an orthodox viewpoint, he/she could react in an extreme way against the opposite idea. Since this kind of person always wants to keep the mind and refuses the others, an interruption in front of a crowd could be considered a humiliation. Then he/she could respond as aggressive as possible. In fact, this kind of option has its own fault. A sentence without a consideration should be considered to come from a careless mind. Furthermore, the moral standards require to let a person the right to prepare before an argument. As the result, I might suffer the wrath of him/her. Even worse, I might share the mistake with him/her for let the vision became true. In addition, the solution of “saying nothing” is the worst choice. The questions could linger in my mind day after day. This kind of feeling would make me uncomfortable.
In conclusion, choosing a suitable behavior is vital. If I attended in a difficult situation like the given example, I would wait until the end of the presentation and ask the speaker. This solution ensures the reputation for both I and him/her as well as prevent from the unexpected results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-31 | Inpu Nguyen | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement: people buy things not because of need but because others also buy them. 90
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Imagine that you are in the classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader say something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best to do?1.Interrupt and correct the mistake right away;2.Wait until the class or meeting us ov 70
- Some people believe that the qualities a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution To what extent do you agree or disagree 64
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'treated'?
Suggestion: treated
...eting or lecture, the speaker should be treat with a highest respect. The presentatio...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...cture, the speaker should be treat with a highest respect. The presentation often...
^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an extreme way" with adverb for "extreme"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... orthodox viewpoint, he/she could react in an extreme way against the opposite idea. Since this k...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'letting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: letting
...urthermore, the moral standards require to let a person the right to prepare before an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, then, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as well as, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73002159827 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80496120809 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496760259179 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.663931212 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4333333333 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.088000096916 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197245191285 0.076458572812 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320475700302 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067510988055 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461218511696 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.