Imagine that you are going to visit a new city, which one of the following ways do you think is the best way to know the city in a short time?
Visit historic sites
Go to shops and markets
Enjoy the restaurant and spend time in cafe
Nowadays, traveling is an interesting and exciting activity for releasing the tension, becoming acquainted with different cultures and food. Each city would have a variety of restaurants, recreational centers, cultural places, shop centers and malls that will attract city’s residents and tourists. Whenever I go to a new town, It is more appealing for me to visit historical sites such as monuments and statuses, palace and castle. I will elaborate on my reasons for the following reasons.
First and foremost, Every city and location would have unique and exclusive historical places to pay attention to and visit. In my viewpoint, historical sites have is distinctive and characteristic properties and words fail to describe them.
There are some advantages for seeing historical or ancient sites, such as sense of nostalgia, connection to the past, and learning from the old world. Admittedly, Some ancient places used to have a story to decipher and to depict by visitors. It is delightful and exciting to know that the information is behind every historical place and why this place built and how it has remained years. Convresly, since the universality all of the cities almost have a similar products in shops, foods in the restaurants that not unique to worth visit.
Another noteworthy point in corroborating my stance is the souvenir aspect. As far as I know and traveled to some ancient places, I can see and buy indigenous clothes, handicrafts, food, decorative staff from local shops around the historical sites. I suppose these local shops would have fiscal, aesthetic, native handicrafts for souvenir application. I can remember a memorable subject about every city that is very invaluable for me. For example, I have a woody status from Gialn city that I bought from a shop nearby to a old village. The native village craved this status from walnut trees that is prevalence in that region.
Last but not least, one of the critical criteria for selecting a place to visit is the financial aspect. From my point of viewpoint, visiting a historical place is very economical for my budget and income. In other words, to say, I can spend a bit of money on getting a ticket and a sandwich. In contrast, in providing going to shop center, I encouraged impulsive purchasing some unnecessary and expensive products. Also, in the restaurant, I only order some food without any advantage.
To recapitulate, I strongly inclined to visiting a historical place due to more memorable, enjoyable, fiscal aspect.The most merit, the cultural and training part that is worth the visit. I can bring a unique and economical souvenir from a city to memorize the travel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ears. Convresly, since the universality all of the cities almost have a similar products i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 525, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ity that I bought from a shop nearby to a old village. The native village craved ...
^
Line 4, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rees that is prevalence in that region. Last but not least, one of the critical ...
^^^
Line 6, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ore memorable, enjoyable, fiscal aspect.The most merit, the cultural and training p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, for example, i suppose, in contrast, such as, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09111617312 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91809769025 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533029612756 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2360316058 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1739130435 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0869565217 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181617122852 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519780232281 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421655471927 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104529797156 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233038040947 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.