It is fact that people are always very curious about new places while travelling to new city for the first time. On that ground, there are various ways through which people can get an idea of the city. In this regard, many people contend that best way to learn about city is through visiting markets or spending time in restaurant of city. On the other side, there is a group of people who believe that every city has its own historic places whereby people can fetch the real information about the city. Certainly, from my vantage point, the latter view contains more weight. For the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most consicuous reasons and examples justifying my stance.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that every historic places represent the main key characteristics of the city, and thereby, those places are always considered as a centre of attraction for tourists. To be more specific, historic places are conserved in a way that it does not only showcase the traditional look of city but always presents the contemporary look of the city.
On the contrary, visiting to shops and shopping markets might cannot provide deep insights of the traditional city. As an example, my last vacation to the city named Jaislmer, can shed light on what has been elaborated above. Jaislmer is a one of the famous historic places of my country. During my trip, I had visited many forts as well as palace located in the centre of the city. In fact, I came across many exellent stories of king of the jaislmer. Not only this but I could see the traditional clothes which the king used to wear and the sword he had used during most of his fights. Admittedly, had I not visited those hisotric places, I would not have realised how beautiful the history of city was once upon a time.
Another noteworthy point is that when talking about the historic places, people always find tourist guide who guide the tourist for all over the trip. On top of that, these tourists guide have dozen of hiddren stories of the ancient city which people cannot find from restaurants or cafeterias. As I mentioned earlier, during my trip to jaislmer, my tourist guide suggested me the famous places of city. Besides that, he had revealed the valuable fact of ancient ancestors like how they used to live, what rituals were being followed, and about their culture and tradition. However, when my parents visited to jaislmer, they did not get to visit historic places, and so, they came back with extremely negative review of city since they did not find the city interesting. Ultimately, it is judicious to say planning a trip without including historic places would be useless to visit the city.
All in all, from contemplating all remarks, although some people may not agree with my view point, I strongly believe that people can obtain many useful information by visitng historic places of city. This is because going to old places would potray the real picture of the city, and because hiring a tourist guide at this place provides a precious details of city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a dozen'.
Suggestion: a dozen
... top of that, these tourists guide have dozen of hiddren stories of the ancient city ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, in fact, talking about, as well as, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78719397363 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46965833718 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470809792844 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1916540448 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.52173913 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0869565217 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60869565217 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195560965068 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629109373245 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662893871932 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109735910712 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612868445668 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.