To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a wide range of debate whether it is better to spend money on salaries university professor or other things in order to improve the quality of education. In my opinion, the benefits of spending money on university facilities clearly outweigh the salaries of professors. I fill this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the ensuing paragraphs.
First of all, if university spends their money on their facilities, they are able to increase students' knowledge and expand their horizon easily. In fact, they can consume their money on buying new books, changing old computers, providing new equipment for laboratories, all of which enable students to become knowledgeable and skillful. In addition, an advanced laboratory provides an opportunity to put their knowledge into practice and enable them to become successful in their future. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. when I was an undergraduate student, our university decided to buy new equipment for all university laboratories. Since our laboratory had sophisticated equipment, I was strongly eager to take some courses related to the laboratory. Subsequently, it helped me to touch real world by doing several experiments. Then, because of having a lot of various valuable experience in doing experiments, I could find a decent job easily. For this reason, facilities of university allow students to become successful in both education and job.
Secondly, spending money on some facilities such as renovating university cafe, club and so forth boost students’ skills socially. As a matter of fact, they are able to make friends and become familiar with various students with a different attitude, which help to interact better with their co-workers in the future. For example, when I was an undergraduate student, I had a part-time job at university campus magazine as a reporter. As I remember, one time, I interviewed professor Nejati, who is a well-known psychologist in my country. He told me that a high percentage of students who were a sociable person, would not have serious problems in their work environment. Also, he told me that they progress easily in order to be a sociable person. As a result, if university spends money on recreation places, students can promote their lives socially.
In conclusion, no one can deny the enormous positive effects of spending money on universities’ facilities. Not only are they able to promote students information and knowledge, but also they provide them a situation which makes them sociable person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
... whether it is better to spend money on salaries university professor or other things in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... illustrate this viewpoint much better. when I was an undergraduate student, our uni...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2160.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28117359413 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11987912933 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540342298289 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7510560849 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4761904762 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38095238095 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207445348845 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706188921201 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899601198126 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153078871855 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941824325932 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.