To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Since the dawn of civilization, education has been playing an important role in the development of human lives. All people have encountered this issue in different ways. Some academicians consider a variety of solutions to improve the quality of education, which among them spending more money on salaries of professors has some proponents. Albeit, a vast majority of experts it is a reasonable way, but some academicians disagree with them. from my perspective, this idea can strongly help to improve the quality of education. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on points of view.
the first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that by increasing their salaries they could focus completely on their research or teaching. Also, they are not worried about the economic situation to take another part-time job to earn money to afford their expenses. To take the personal experience as an example, I had a biology professor, he always was busy and even could not concentrate when taught. As he had to get a hurry up after class he did not answer our questions.
Another noteworthy point is that if they have enough salary they sometimes can help their students in the financial problems of the project. Therefore, increasing their salaries in some situations not only is beneficial for them but also assists students to have a relaxed mind.
Although in our university some of our professors are stingy, I think increasing their salaries will show their value, they are high ranked members of the society. The statistics revealed, in 90% of developed country the teachers are part of the groups that get many salaries, though, in the undeveloped countries, the opposite results have been reported.
In brief, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that raising the salary of the professor has many advantages that could be shown in a short period of time. Consequently, it is highly recommended, the government takes consideration of other aspects too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...t some academicians disagree with them. from my perspective, this idea can strongly ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... I will elaborate on points of view. the first exquisite reason to be mentioned ...
^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
... example, I had a biology professor, he always was busy and even could not concentrate whe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... class he did not answer our questions. Another noteworthy point is that if they...
^^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...vantages that could be shown in a short period of time. Consequently, it is highly recommended...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, i think, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13271604938 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93869141881 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595679012346 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.683070619 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164316892892 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442404024534 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700511606113 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074602908227 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549009731663 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.