TPO 17 integrated writing
The reading discusses the increasing human population and agriculture accompanied by the decrease of the birds' population. The author listed three factors to support this idea. However, the lecturer asserts these reasons are not convincing and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author mentioned that by expanding human population, the birds' habitat will decrease and finally will disappear. On the contrary, the author dismissed this idea and declares that it provides a better and larger habitat for other birds like pigeons and also rodents. In another word, it causes some animals to increase and others to decrease.
In addition, the reading points out that agricultural activities will enhance following the growth of the human population. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on this issue by standing that the truth is different than something assumed in the reading. In fact, nowadays, fewer and fewer lands use for agriculture because the introduction of the plants with high productivity they no need to longer destroy the wilderness.
Last but not least, the reading passage proposes that pesticide endangered the life of birds and it is a reason for the birds' death or at least if it does not kill them will reduce their reproductivity success. On the other hand, in contradiction to the reading passage, the speaker claims that the ecologists are aware of the danger of pesticides. As a result, they tried to solve it with two methods. First of all, by producing new less toxic pesticides, secondly, by cultivating the plants that they are more pest-resistant crops.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ture accompanied by the decrease of the birds population. The author listed three fac...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...that by expanding human population, the birds habitat will decrease and finally will ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ing the growth of the human population. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on t...
^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...by standing that the truth is different than something assumed in the reading. In fa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... than something assumed in the reading. In fact, nowadays, fewer and fewer lands u...
^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ife of birds and it is a reason for the birds death or at least if it does not kill t...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat they are more pest-resistant crops.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, at least, in addition, in contrast, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21923076923 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81425996873 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0972388025 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.384615385 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9230769231 7.06452816374 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353419004791 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105662524299 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104050869841 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190634766063 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386820815429 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.