Independent task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Independent task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Throghout history people always have looked for a job, which can secure their future. Also they have wanted a job sutitable for them which they can become a successful in that area. Personally, I believe that in the past people easily can understand which job has a bright future. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, in our sophisticated world technology plays a crucial role in everything. Due to pervasive influence of that everything changes rapidly. No one can deny this fact. Technology has great impact on jobs. It changes lot of jobs or demolish various of works. Therefore, it is no longer easy to forecast what happen in the near future. Because there are different robots which can replace with human and take the job from them. For instance, in my country hand maded car was very popular. Lots of people choose that filled because they know they could get a high salary job. But, suddenly everything changed Tesla company invent a machine which could produces cars even more delight than all experts on companies. So, all of them lost their jobs.
Secondly, nowadays there are more people than in last decades. So, they are more competition for every job opportunity. Moreover, in modern era more people are educated in comparison to our pervious generation. Companies consider these factors and they know in anytime they can hire another person to their tasks. Therefore, they do not hesitate to hire new people and replace them with their workers. So, even if you are an expert in one job it not mean anything.

In conclusion, I think nowadays is harder to find out which job will secure your future. This is because technology changes every things fast and has an influence in our jobs also more people fight for different job oppurtonities.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...r a job, which can secure their future. Also they have wanted a job sutitable for th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 659, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'produce'
Suggestion: produce
...la company invent a machine which could produces cars even more delight than all experts...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[6]
Message: “So , even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le and replace them with their workers. So, even if you are an expert in one job it not mean anything. In conclusion, I think nowadays is h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'means'?
Suggestion: means
... if you are an expert in one job it not mean anything. In conclusion, I think now...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51003082981 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2464846333 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.5652173913 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5652173913 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60869565217 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950012222018 0.236089414692 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292638113446 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270453290624 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660427348337 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155775559404 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.