It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents than to choose jobs that are different from their parent's jobs.
Our Careers make a crucial part in our lives. It is thought by some people that it would be better for children if they choose a career that is completely different to their parent’ jobs, rather than choosing a job that is the same as their parents is. This essay will discuss why, in fact, children should choose a job that is similar to their parent’s jobs.
First and foremost, contrary to the belief that children should base their decisions about their careers on their desires and passions, evidence shows that children who followed their parent’s footsteps were more successful. For example, statistics have revealed that 78 percent of children who followed their passions for their career choices, they did not do well on achieving their objectives. Therefore, those children could not pursue their dreams. This supports the idea that children who do not wisely think about what are the possibilities to become successful in life. They would fail to reach their goals somewhere in the process. Having parents in the same field would help students to get the support they would need on any stage of their careers.
Second, it is important to consider the fact that the profession would be expanded in the family. That would be an identification for the family. For instance, my personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a child, I always wanted to become a doctor like my father. I grew up around the medical books such as humans body atlases, which really fascinated me. When I grew up, I studied medicine. After I graduated, I worked as a doctor and I always thought that my kids would choose the same field as me and my father. Consequently, the profession would be kept into the family for a generation to come. If my child would not choose to become a doctor, then that prestige would vanish away. That is something that I never would wish for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'would' and 'wish'.
Suggestion: would never wish
...d vanish away. That is something that I never would wish for.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, really, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98422712934 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90910920027 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555205047319 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.0294758095 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.