It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs.
It is a prevalent phenomenon that a growing number of parents prefer their kids to choose the jobs similar to them. Though kids can acquire more experience from their parents in this way, I sill contend that it is better for children to choose their jobs that are different from their parents' job rather than those similar.
To begin with, the jobs parents chose may not be promising enough for their kids. As is known to us, with the rapid development of our society, everything is changing at a speed which is faster than ever, including the jobs. Probably some popular jobs would be obsolete after a few years. For instance, during the 80th last century, in China, toll collector working in highway toll booth were once considered as an ideal job so that many parents working there try their best to get a position there for their children. However, as the popularization of computers and other intelligent devices, the toll station do not need so many labour any more, which contributes to a high unemployment rate of the collectors. Thus, considering these incredibly enormous changes happen every day, parents' jobs can be discarded by society in the future, which may have negative influence on the career plan of the kids if they choose jobs similar to their parents.
Secondly, there are no leaves exactly the same, as an old saying goes, which means even if they are parents and children, they do not share the same dream and taste. It is inevitable to see that children fails to perform as well as their parents do in their jobs, lacking in interest and passion, both of which play significant roles in one's career. Generally, owing to the nature of children, they tend to do something different from what their parents do to seek excitement from this kind of adventure. Perhaps, choosing these jobs could either allow kids to acquire self-satisfaction and sense of achievement.
Granted, if kids take jobs similar to their parents', they can obtain valuable working experience directly from their parents, extremely meaningful and helpful to their career development. Nevertheless, we can not ignore the update of knowledge and skills in these fields. It might well happen that when kids enter the workplace, they would find their parents experience is not pragmatic any more. In addition, as far as I am concerned, it is not something terrible for kids to earn experience from their own growth during working, though sometimes the process can be frustrated and challenging.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it could be better if children choose different jobs from their parents, rather than semblable jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...in with, the jobs parents chose may not be promising enough for their kids. As is known to u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun labour seems to be countable; consider using: 'many labours'.
Suggestion: many labours
...evices, the toll station do not need so many labour any more, which contributes to a high u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...both of which play significant roles in ones career. Generally, owing to the nature ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98185941043 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66355851072 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517006802721 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0011873123 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.235294118 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9411764706 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465423981032 0.236089414692 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168246524463 0.076458572812 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134071203094 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32414061048 0.150856017488 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123670358789 0.0645574589148 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.