It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city
Thanks to the advent of modern technology, many aspects of human life have been revolutionized, to the point that large cities provide a wide range of facilities and possibilities to their citizens. There seems to be a little agreement on whether children can achieve success in countryside or in the cities. From my point of view, children can progress far better in a city than countryside. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint.
From a social perspective, one should acquire ant obtain essential and fundamental skills to attain success at the later stages of own life. Furthermore, today, cities provide a context in which people can satisfy their material and non-material needs much more effectively, which sets the stage for growth of their children. For the purpose of illustration, consider the huge amount of money spent on developing the process of learning in schools of large cities, which is naturally followed by children's enhancing capabilities and abilities in the course of time. Therefore, living in cities can serve the long-term and short-term interests of children.
Furthermore, living in cities can create an atmosphere for children to spend most of their time studying and learning, which may not take place in countryside. Hence, children are able to tackle their personal and social problems a lot better, which is rooted in high quality of learning process in cities. Besides, such a child is not only beneficial for private life but also effective for own society. Another point to take into consideration is that children obtaining essential capabilities can set the stage for the growth of peers by motivating them to carry out their school's responsibilities. By way of explanation, consider a child living in a New York which is one of the biggest and modern cities in the word, such a child can select his career from lower age. This is because of the modern technology which broaden children’s knowledge about themselves. Therefore, living in cities is more useful for children in today's world.
To sum up, I hold the view that living in cities is more beneficial for children to build their future and can climb the ladder of success far better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...climb the ladder of success far better.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10743801653 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93600590654 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531680440771 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5733700663 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315600866543 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105492316107 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703526211846 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207441809768 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316641769628 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.