it is better to choose a job with a high salary even though they do not like that job.
Agree or disagree?
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that during this era of modernization, every other person wants to be successful and happy in his life. In this regard, a good job with a good salary is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars whether people should do the work they enjoy or prefer the high salaries even if they do not like the job. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of getting highly paid for a job is better in this modern world. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my opinion is the fact that people want a high salary to enjoy a luxury lifestyle. It is crystal clear that in this current period of time, there is a lot of competition among people to become the elite of society. By living such a life, they look happy and contended. Thus, it is notable that the majority of the individuals want to adopt the successful people's lifestyle. So they prefer a high amount of money in return for the job they do even if they do not like it. They can enjoy a luxurious trip abroad, have expensive cars and own their property. By way of illustration, my father is a doctor and he is working in a hospital for 25 years. Although he does not like the administration and the system of the hospital, he still decided to work with them for the high salary he earns to live a healthy and elite life. By doing so, he is glad that he never quit the job. This clearly examples my reason.
The second rationale behind my thinking is rooted in the fact that people get comfortable after some time with the job they do not like if they are getting paid high enough to meet their basic requirements. It is worth mentioning that nowadays, even supporting a family is a great responsibility on a person due to the increasing expenses. Moreover, there are fewer job opportunities today because of the saturated market. As a result, people are happy with a job they do not like and on top of that if they are getting paid enough to meet their requirements. If they do not like their job, they get used to it knowing the salary. Vividly this point can only be achieved by the sense of contentment with the job people have. A case in mind, currently, my husband does not love his job but he is happy with the salary because he can fulfill the needs of his family.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although the excitement towards the job is necessary, the salary counts a lot more than that. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating: first, people want a luxurious lifestyle, secondly, money provides comfort to their family. As for the writer's advice, I vehemently urge people to look for a job with a high salary to compete with the modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...if they do not like the job. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of get...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t is crystal clear that in this current period of time, there is a lot of competition among pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ndividuals want to adopt the successful peoples lifestyle. So they prefer a high amount...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...des comfort to their family. As for the writers advice, I vehemently urge people to loo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as for, as a result, by and large, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48554913295 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60243599424 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45472061657 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0375437861 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.12 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.76 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394747727359 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117925980236 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113374724072 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269314859308 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074401411355 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.