It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
We all know about the well-known fact that 'knowledge is wealth'. Academics is the basic of every information that we know. I personally believe that diverse knowledge of many academic subjects is much better than knowing about one specific field. I have three main rationales for holding this opinion which I will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, studying a variety of subjects is better because if we get a job in any other field rather than what we studied, we can utilize our diverse subject knowledge in that field and we can achieve heights in that career, For instance, my husband is a dentist. When my family reached the USA, he couldn't find a job as a dentist. Therefore, he attended interviews rather than dentistry, and eventually, he got a job as a medical technologist in the county hospital. As a dental student, he studied a variety of syllabus like Anatomy, Biochemistry, Blood bank, Physiology, etc... This knowledge made him sustain in his new career and now he got promoted as Medical Analyst and he got a hike in his pay-check. This example illustrates how important we should have vast academic knowledge.
Secondly, if we specialize only in a specific subject, we only have knowledge of that field. Those people don't know anything rather than that special field. My sister's professional life is a compelling example of this. During her school days, she was interested in Biology. Consequently, she took Biology as a major during her college time. But she was destined to study Engineering in her later life. She struggled a lot with this career since she didn't have any basic knowledge of that profession. She felt disdained which made her dropping that career and 2 years was squandered. Indeed, She still regrets studying various fields can ameliorate her job opportunities and her knowledge.
In sum, I strongly feel that profound knowledge of vast subjects is essential in this competitive world to sustain. we can get more opportunities and don't get rejected from another field if we have vast info.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ist. When my family reached the USA, he couldnt find a job as a dentist. Therefore, he ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e knowledge of that field. Those people dont know anything rather than that special ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...uggled a lot with this career since she didnt have any basic knowledge of that profes...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...l in this competitive world to sustain. we can get more opportunities and dont get...
^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tain. we can get more opportunities and dont get rejected from another field if we h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97093023256 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83591635618 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5410905634 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4285714286 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.380952381 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201855504697 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617431850477 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905174741807 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132555572047 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610424950775 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.