Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people argue that it is best to became an expert in one specific subject matter. They cite that specialization in one field helps to remain focus in one direction and increase more engagement and enhance individual learning ability to support their point. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that it is better to be jack of all things, but master of none. I will support my viewpoint with two reasons.
To begin with, knowing gigantic subjects helps to solve the issues in real life. For instance, even if you are an art students you should have basic understanding of mathematics and science because they are essential in our day-to-day activities, from groceries shopping to yearly tax computation. It is important to solve minor problems in our life because if we can't tackle minor issues in our life, then we can't compete to this globalization world. Thus, knowledge of voluminous subjects helps to overcome our daily occurring genuine problems.
Secondly, having a towering knowledge in multiple field gives one to an opportunity to have varied career. For example, I am artist and an agriculture graduate, and also I have recently joined a MBA class. These three amalgam of knowledge make me an successful as not only agriculture entrepreneur, but also lionalize me in the field of art. It is important to have opportunity in a diverse career because if you fail in one field, then there will be numerous door open for you. Therefore, knowledge in various subject gives a fortunate to have various career.
To sum up, the issue of whether having a wider knowledge in numerous subject or specialize in one field is better or not is complex. Some have suggested that to be focus and boost the career in life one should be expert in one field. Nevertheless, I still contend that without the knowledge of voluminous field one can't compete to this globalization world and can't withstand in day-to-day activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...inor problems in our life because if we cant tackle minor issues in our life, then w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ackle minor issues in our life, then we cant compete to this globalization world. Th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'towering knowledge'.
Suggestion: towering knowledge
...g genuine problems. Secondly, having a towering knowledge in multiple field gives one to an oppor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...aduate, and also I have recently joined a MBA class. These three amalgam of knowl...
^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hese three amalgam of knowledge make me an successful as not only agriculture entr...
^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t the knowledge of voluminous field one cant compete to this globalization world and...
^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...compete to this globalization world and cant withstand in day-to-day activities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96636085627 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83457371464 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525993883792 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6026122227 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232020959369 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841544398302 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513529042142 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144436324298 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409651745729 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.