is it better to preserve a long-term friendship with a few people or to find new friends easily
Without the shadow of doubt, friendship is one of the most important aspects of our life since childhood. Actually, except our family, friends are the most impressive, and subsequently, helpful people in our life. Controversy surrounds the issue of whether maintaining a friendship with a small group over a long period is crucial or to keep it with many new friends. I am of the opinion that it's better to be able to preserve long-lasting friendships with a few people instead of so many new ones. the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
To commerce, a long-lasting friendship can bring about mutual recognition, which is the most important issue in the process of friendship. In fact, people need someone to talk with, laugh with, even live with and so on. these tasks are the main purpose of a relationship between two people. Broadly speaking, people built up a relationship to achieve these vital goals. Obviously, it takes a long time to be able to recognize someone's characteristic. Take myself as an example, I established a friendship with my friend since we were nine years old. During these twelve years of relationship we are thoroughly familiar with our moral facets and it is the main reason that this relationship is growing even better every year and we both don't want to ruin it because we need each other to sooth our pains that life, inevitably, imposes.
Secondly, loyalty is among the prerequisites of a successful relationship. Basically, people start a friendship to enhance the quality of their life, not to damage it, and loyalty is the key factor to have a good relationship. As a matter fact, a loyal person would put his best effort to help his friend and would take his friend's success as his. As now the importance of loyalty is clear to us, I would like to claim that loyalty will be brought about during a long-time period. For example, my friend has a newly-come friend and talked her about all her secrets in life. Unfortunately, she was not a reliable person and revealed all these secrets and caused a lot of problems for my friend. If she was an old friend, I am sure that loyalty would avoid her from revealing the secrets.
To sum it up, we should all be able to preserve a long-term friendship with a few people, because it would definitely guarantee our happiness. Hence, the key factors that this relationship can provide happiness lay down in loyalty and also mutual recognition that are both build up during a long period of time, and certainly with a couple of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...few people instead of so many new ones. the following explanations will further ela...
^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... laugh with, even live with and so on. these tasks are the main purpose of a relatio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 738, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...wing even better every year and we both dont want to ruin it because we need each ot...
^^^^
Line 13, column 297, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...on that are both build up during a long period of time, and certainly with a couple of people....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, hence, if, second, secondly, so, broadly speaking, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82727272727 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87054631682 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513636363636 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8062003808 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319862339771 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898703194451 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899397231937 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203933466759 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801486087053 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.