Needless to say, all human beings are like students in all steps of their lives and they learn many useful aspects of life either in school classes or in the streets, however, it has long since been a matter of debates whether learning through books and in school is more significant or learning through feeling and experience. Insofar as I am concerned, the knowledge which is obtained in the light of experiences is more functional than the knowledge gained by reading books. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explain in the following essay.
The first and the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that the skills which learned through experience never will be forgotten. An incident whether painful or joyful always remind in mind and teaches many things to us; if it had a good result, we try to repeat that again, and if it was a bad feeling, we evade from feel that again. For example, my brother got his driving license three years ago. He has not a car, so he has not driven much. Last year, I gave my car to him and wanted him to take me to my job; when he reached to a square he did not stop because he had forgotten that each car that reaches to the square must stop and when the square is vacant it can go into the square. We had a bad accident owing to my brother's mistake, however, after that event, my brother learned how to enter a square. As a result, you may forget a driving rule that you have read in the textbook but you never forget a car crash that you experienced it.
Secondly, experiences are more tangible than books. Never can anyone ever cast a shadow of doubt on the importance of the utilizing knowledge and using them in the real life. Of course, of those sundries of manners which we read in the books, we learn the ones that we sense their influence on our lives and we feel them both emotionally and physically. For instance, I studied civil engineering at the university. We had a lot of theoretical lessons which comprised many mathematical rules and equations. Although we learned all those rules and lessons, they could not convey the sense of being an engineer to us until our laboratory lessons started and we started to use our knowledge in real conditions. We were struggling with combining materials to make a durable and strong concrete and we were trying to utilize all we have learned in the books and this was a really good experience. Consequently, of course, knowledge which we learn in the books are crucial, but they are a preconception to use them in the real situations.
To put in the nutshell, I have personally subscribed to the view that the skills which we learn by feeling are more essential than the knowledge we learn with books. Experiences are not only stored in the memory for many years but also they are more practical and tangible. It is about time universities and schools provided more laboratories and compelled students to learn through books and experiences simultaneously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put before the verb 'experience'.
Suggestion: never experience
...s that the skills which learned through experience never will be forgotten. An incident whether ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 533.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57410881801 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61154331219 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474671669794 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4272935042 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.095238095 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.380952381 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52380952381 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177844188951 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620053388557 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709334153326 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130381507892 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638414832857 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.