Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Needless to say, on no account would anybody survive without nourishing with meals which we eat at least three times a day. A sundry of people there are who back the idea that food which is cooked in a short period of time paves the way to have more hours to be involved with other tasks and this manner helps to make life better. My experience has been that this type of food does not help to heighten living conditions. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explain in this essay.
The first and the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that fast prepared food is not generally healthy. Most of the materials, which are used in the fast food, are frozen or conserved and it causes to decrease the quality of them and lessens the amount of protein and vitamins which are available in fresh ingredients. For example, my friend works in a hypermarket and he eats his launch usually at his workplace. There is a fast food restaurant adjacent to the hypermarket and my friend, John, goes to that restaurant and consumes his food there. Although he is thankful in the light of the restaurant’s rapid services he not only gains no protein or other essential components but also he suffers from obesity. However, I advise him to change his eating habits and to eat healthful food but he never takes care of his body. As a result, promptly prepared food diminishes human beings’ fitness and puts their life in danger.
Moreover, my second reason is that cooking food is an enjoyable effort. To be more specific, a chef is equal to an artist and cooking is a kind of art which conveys confidence and satisfaction to the individuals. For instance, my mother is a resigned person and she does not work anymore, in the other words, she is a housekeeper woman and involves with home tasks. Additionally, she is a good cook and her meals are really delicious. She enjoys providing meals and she has the idea that if she does not fill his time in the kitchen, she will be in the depressed mood. Of course, she spends a lot of time to prepare our launch or dinner and she is really diligent about this. Each time we say to her that she has done her best and her food was incredible she smiles and this makes us happy. Consequently, in no circumstances, is a food which is made in a few minutes a way of increasing life satisfactory.
To put in the nutshell, in my opinion fast prepared food does not help persons to have an excellent life because of lack of pleasure and health. It is high time all of us changed our belief about food and made our meals conscientiously.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ea that food which is cooked in a short period of time paves the way to have more hours to be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: decreasing
..., are frozen or conserved and it causes to decrease the quality of them and lessens the amo...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, at least, for example, for instance, i feel, kind of, of course, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46624472574 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62633486371 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502109704641 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6299966864 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.80952381 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90476190476 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136011350401 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468918384393 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430568401938 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892026354884 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402411033613 0.0645574589148 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.