A sundry of people there are who back the idea that convenience of the human beings is more important than the preserving the Earth. However, the activities of people affect the environment and there is no agreement whether this effect is harmful or positive. In my opinion, human's tasks make the Earth devastated. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explain in this essay.
The first and the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that human beings cut woods and ignite jungles. Never anyone can ever cast a shadow of doubt on the importance of the woods in the building of houses or furniture, but by cutting them exceedingly, we damage the face of the Earth. On the other hand, by burning wood pieces to keep homes warm, we accelerate the process of destroying jungles. For example, there are several countries like Sweden which not only use a lot of equipment that produced by wood but also construct their dwellings with wood. To provide the ingredients of that products, jungles must be cut. Consequently, these countries replace a jungle of trees with a jungle of houses and reshape the earlier beautiful Earth's view.
Secondly, People's actions make the Earth polluted. Contaminated air is one of the most significant issues that we are exposed to it. Toxic air will increase the temperature of the Earth and it results in the death of many species which live on our planet. For instance, I live in a city which is strikingly populated and there are a lot of factories that surround the city. The air of my hometown is noxious in the light of not only the factories but also the numerous cars. Of course, it is difficult to breathe in such a polluted atmosphere and it causes creatures to perish. The Earth that was someday full of vibrant habitats is going to be a ground with many buried animals an people beneath it.
To put in the nutshell, I have personally subscribed to the view that our efforts damaged the Earth. We not only have polluted its air but also cut its jungles. It is high time we left our bad habits and treated kindly with the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...an beings cut woods and ignite jungles. Never anyone can ever cast a shadow of doubt ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...to be a ground with many buried animals an people beneath it. To put in the nutsh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i feel, of course, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62096774194 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5628234873 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9267961942 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.95 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217115510258 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651948820949 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664320092198 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128332841635 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750775891679 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.