Needless to say, a sundry of people there are who back the idea that telling some white lies in relationships for the purpose of relieving debates is acceptable, or more exactly, evading from telling the truth has not any significant negative effect on a relationship. However, in no way would I agree with this idea that we can be honest or, on the contrary, a liar according to the situation we are in. being truthful causes a lasting relationship and the trust between partners.
To begin with, undoubtedly, on no circumstances would anybody want to cut his relationship with his best friends. Even a very simple and little lie sometimes can be a reason to end a friendship. For example, my brother had a colleague that was his best friend likewise. After the work hours, they also met each other every afternoon and went to parties and sports together. One day there was a problem in their workplace and something was going wrong. Obviously, my brother's friend was the culprit of that problem and he had not do his responsibility well. But in that situation, he lied and pretended that the mistake was from my brother. After that incident, my brother ceased his friendship with his friend and never ever met him again and believed a good friend in either good conditions or bad conditions must act frankly. Subsequently, a little lie could stop a strong relationship.
Secondly, as a matter of fact, the trust between the two sides of a relationship is one of the most important feelings. Being truthful and standing in the right side always heighten a sense in friends that their friend is reliable. For instance, I had a girlfriend and we were in a relationship full of love. We were always together and always told each other our decisions. However, one day my darling told me that she was at home and was studying. I realized that she was lying and she was at a party with her friends. After that day, each time that she told me her place or what she is doing I suspected her and could not trust her and this was annoying me. Also, I thought that it was not essential that I always told her what I was doing and, by the same token, I started to conceal something from her. All in all, hiding the truth diminishes the sense of trust between partners.
To put in a nutshell, I would indeed accept the fact that being honest and telling the truth is always requisite in relationships. The friendships last for long periods and are full of trust owing to being frank and telling the reality. It is the high time people forgot to be a liar depend on the situation and always stood in the right side
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... culprit of that problem and he had not do his responsibility well. But in that si...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...nds. After that day, each time that she said me her place or she said me what she is...
^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
... time that she said me her place or she said me what she is doing I suspected her an...
^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: I_A[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am' (first person of "to be")?
Suggestion: am
...se of trust between partners. To put I a nutshell, I would indeed accept the fac...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, frankly, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, as a matter of fact, on the contrary, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54661016949 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66314486333 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478813559322 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6063317972 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4166666667 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150155615444 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459968181627 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401039229098 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981411422652 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039283996579 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.