It is important to marry someone who's similar to you, rather than someone who's different from you
Every important life choice should be carefully made and consequences should be weighed beforehand in order to avoid regret. Some young couples are destroyed because of diverging opinions between the two spouses. Marriage is a life choice. Therefore, partners should spend some time figuring out who is ideal to them. One should marry a person similar to him or her, for they will be able to understand and help each other easily as well as progress together due to the fact that they have similar plans.
First, marrying someone just like one benefits both spouses because they will have shared beliefs with them. For instance, while she is introverted, a woman in my community married someone an extroverted man. The consequence of this dissimilar marriage was that they had divergent perspective about how to raise their children. The woman used to let the kids wander in the neighborhood; on the opposite, the man prefered the children to go accompanied by someone. For more than 3 months, the couple would quarrell every morning because they lack common agreements about how their children are going to go to school.
Second, people who are similar to their partners understand and can easily help them. People cannot understand each other unless they have experienced similar things. For instance, a young couple in my hometown had a problem. In fact, the man spent an entire week going back home completely drunk. His wife got frustrated about that. His wife's family members advised her to leave her husband. The woman refused because she acknowledged that the husband's problem might be that he was depressed. Consequently, she approached him in order to figure out what was wrong. The man told her what he was experiencing, and that is how their couple was saved. The woman was able to connect with her husband because of their similarity, which made her understand that her husband's refuge from depression was alcohol.
In conclusion, ideal marriage partners should be similar to their spouses because they share the same perspectives of life, and they are able to connect and understand each other easily. Divergence in opinions, which originates from the various characters of partners, can throw a couple apart. Moreover, dissimilar people hardly empathize with one another.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd and help each other easily as well as progress together due to the fact that ...
^^
Line 1, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ily as well as progress together due to the fact that they have similar plans. ...
^^
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... progress together due to the fact that they have similar plans. First, marry...
^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the neighborhood; on the opposite, the man prefered the children to go accompan...
^^
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quarrell every morning because they lack common agreements about how their childr...
^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol. Second, people who are similar to their partners understand and can easily...
^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'husbands'' or 'husband's'?
Suggestion: husbands'; husband's
...fused because she acknowledged that the husbands problem might be that he was depressed....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11466666667 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6487316881 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530666666667 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3657224929 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3913043478 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3043478261 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0878384692889 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247207144995 0.076458572812 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336223800283 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550071531126 0.150856017488 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194408678057 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.