The Principle of Scientific Management
In his book, The Principles of Scientific Management (1991), Frederick Winslow Taylor proposed a method that aims at improving the productivity of workers in factories.
It is stated in the passage that the first step proposed by Mr. Taylor is a thorough study of time-and-motion in factories that is dedicated to calculate the time spent by workers to accomplish their respective jobs. The professor casts doubt on this idea by arguing that this practice does not benefit factories because it consumes money as inspectors are necessary for the study to be conducted.
The author claims that according to Taylor's principles, all workers would be required to work extensively in order to reform the productivity of lower-skilled workers. The professor counters this by saying that following Taylor's principles, low-skill workers were asked to perform tasks at an irrealistic pace. As a result, most of them were not appreciative of the study that they would attempt to stop the ongoing study.
Another principle of Taylor was that high-skilled workers' jobs would be broken in chunks so that lower-skilled can be able to replace them. The profesor diagrees with this statement and stated that it would not improve the efficiency of the factory because high-skilled workers will no longer enjoy high salaries. As a matter of fact, specialized workers will attempt to substitute these scientific management methods in jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... productivity of lower-skilled workers. The professor counters this by saying that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31415929204 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99231859161 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.853057686 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.444444444 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136493462663 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659843984216 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110193995821 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113898335308 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128796010617 0.0443174109184 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.