Every individual has their own way of studying. However, the two most common ways are either memorizing facts or learn the concepts behind the facts. Most people might choose the option to just study the facts. Personally, I believe that it is better to go deeper into concepts than just learning the facts. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, learning about the concepts and ideas will leave no room for doubt. This will clear out any confusion and obstacles they might face later. If students understand any concept clearly from school, it will be easier for them to solve any sort of complications they might face while doing their homework or assignment. Moreover, they do not have to wait for anyone else to help them elucidate the problems they face. For instance, one of my friend who graduated as an engineer had to face difficulty while giving the interview for a job. He was asked to answer a technical question, which he was unable to because he was not sure about the answer he had in his mind. He passed every exam in university only by studying the lecture and the notes. He did not bother to go deeper into the subject or learn anything practically. Hence, now he had to lose a huge chance to work in his dream company.
Secondly, clarification of concepts will stay in our head, where just memorizing facts will not. If we understand the reason behind why a particular thing happens, this will remain in our head for a long time. However, if we just memorize information from the text or lectures, this is transient, i.e. will stay temporarily. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in high school, I had difficulty in understanding physics. I used to only memorize the facts but later on test days, it was hard to remember of face conceptual questions. That is when I started to work on understanding the concepts than just memorizing the information. This has helped me not only remember the facts but also face the conceptual questions.
In conclusion, I strongly believe students should focus more on the depth of any subject rather than just going over the facts. This is because this will clear any sort of confusion or doubt for them and whatever they study will remain in their head always.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... by studying the lecture and the notes. He did not bother to go deeper into the su...
^^
Line 3, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not bother to go deeper into the subject or learn anything practically. Hence, no...
^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...er they study will remain in their head always.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67980295567 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58878126621 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8386013974 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1666666667 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285352371825 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775105351018 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077896182083 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17559083939 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470299871259 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.