The lecture and the text offers two opposing views on the allegation stated on the movie Gone with the Wind by the viewers and critics. Though the text explains how the movie is important but also provide signs of racism, the professor counters the points and says that the allegation are overstated. She explains what she feels about the movie and how the text could be wrong.
Initially, the professor talks about the point stated by the text how the Southern women made a mistake by going to war. However, the professor thinks that it was a right thing to do and this decision was not portrayed rash. She includes that the women did not face any difficulties after the war, instead the opportunities for women to work increased.
Secondly, the lecturer explains how not giving the name initially, Prissy, does not affect the point that the character was fearless. Moreover, the actor was the first African- American to win the best actor's award. Furthermore, the text states that the director asked her to perform as a dim-wit, however, the professor explains that she did more than that. She showed the rebellious side of her through her performance. Moreover, Malcom X's opinion was opposed by the lecturer and she explained that he might have been deceived by the high pitched voice of the actor.
Lastly, the professor explains how the viewers should appreciate the movie and the acting instead of being embarrassed as this has allowed an opportunity for the African-American women to live a better life and to live freely.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90421455939 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59026501536 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2455618971 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0749337915754 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302577009803 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353923195771 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0523292125663 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381219850518 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.