When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why?

Since childhood, my mother always took me to the park at 5 p.m. so that I can play with my friends. SHe always encouraged me to be active physically. She explained how participating in physical activities can help our current and future health. Moreover, it does not cost us much to be active. So in my response, I think it is physical education courses should be mandetory for every school.

We all know that to stay healthy and fit, we need be involved in physical activities. This habit of being physically active has to commence from a young age. As children nowdays are glued to their tabs and cell phones, this results to diseases like diabetics, obesity, high cholestrol, etc. For instance, one of my friends used to avoid all sorts of physical activity, he used sit in the library under the air conditioner while most of us enjoyed ourselves outside playing basketball or volleyball. Now, at the age of 24, he is suffering from obesity, which also lead him to having high cholestrol. Hence, we should encourage our children to be more active and in order to do that we should keep physical courses in school.

Furthermore, I think physical education is cost effective compared to art and music. As we know, art and music is a very elite course. Everything required regarding art and music, starting from a paint brush or a guitar to the teachers who are going to train the students are expensive. For example, in Bangladesh, the salary of a professional art or music teacher is almost $200, which is quite a lot to pay for a middle class family. Moreover, not only the teachers, but the instruments required to learn is also expensive. A middle class parents cannot afford the cost to teach Piano to their children, as both the teacher and piano is expensive. Addition to that, they also have to maintain a piano in the house in order for the child to practice. So for a school with lower funds and teachers, conducting arts and music course can become a problem.

Some might argue that physical education can also be expensive as arts and music, however, physical education can be achieved at zero cost as well. Kids do not always need a teacher to play. For example, if the children wants to play catch or hide and seek, which falls under the physical activities, they do not need a teacher to train them how to play these somple games. Any teacher or gurdian can invigulate them. Hence physical education saves a lot of money for the school if we consider this point.

In conclusion, we should galvanize our children in getting into physical activity more which will pave a healthierv and better future for them. Moreover, as discussed earlier, this will be a better option for schools going through crisis regarding funds and teachers.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'parent'?
Suggestion: parent
...learn is also expensive. A middle class parents cannot afford the cost to teach Piano t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...teacher or gurdian can invigulate them. Hence physical education saves a lot of money...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72614107884 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62501511637 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7264265731 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6153846154 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290358650349 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816785775127 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738350237526 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160291356933 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174905495927 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.