Is it more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for a long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for a shorter hours?
Whenever it comes to the issue, I would defenitely choose work in a five days with normal hours. Although working just three days sounds appealling to some extent, as fas as I concerned, I would still agree with work normal hours. Even there are hundreds of statement behind my respond I would like to write essential three statements.
First of me reasoning would be that arranging my work in suitable way. It makes the work easy to handle without stress or pressure of time. For example, when I was working in one of the top company of my country, there was a hunders of things to in just a week. To get over these work I planned my things in five days with regular hours which makes my work more efficient and helped me get over hard projects without any mistakes. So in conclusion, to save your time we should organize our time in fivedays.
Secondly, in addition to efficient work, it is also gave my advangtage to manage hours both in work and family. By arranging my hours I spend more time with my family. For example, even working three days sounds less time in work and more time with other things, it will be stressful and maybe they will spend most time to get enough sleep that they could not get in three days which decrease their time to spend with thier family. So let us assume that working in regular work is proving us more suitable and healthy lifestyle.
Last but not least, in this section I want to share my opinion about important thing in life- Health. One of my nephew used to work in mining company with working plan of three full days work and five days rest. And few years later he got disease which is not commen just because of work without no rest is three days row. As a result he spend two years of his life in hospital. By giving this example I would say that good arrangement of work is better choice to everyone to live healthier and happier.
Therefore, when it comes to the decision of whether working three days a week for long hours or work five days a week for shorter hours as far as there offered a choice. I would always prefer working in five days wish shorter hours without any doubt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed, I would still agree with work normal hours. Even there are hundreds of statem...
^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or example, when I was working in one of the top company of my country, there was...
^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
... addition to efficient work, it is also gave my advangtage to manage hours both in w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...work without no rest is three days row. As a result he spend two years of his life...
^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
... rest is three days row. As a result he spend two years of his life in hospital. By g...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39898989899 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21717746945 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474747474747 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.643296029 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6842105263 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323482177042 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115028913368 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10777847453 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226660307769 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120271793773 0.0645574589148 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 58.1214874552 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.