It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
It goes without saying that the requirements of modern life compelled humans to strive in their occupations. They spend most of their time and energy at work to improve the quality of their lives. The overriding question here is whether it is better to work longer hours for three days a week or five days a week for shorter hours. Most people believe that it is better to work five days a week for shorter hours because it will help them to have more energy after work to enjoy with their families. In my perspective, working three days a week for longer hours is more beneficial, in what follows I will elaborate my reasons.
First and foremost, working only three days a week allows the individual to save more time, energy, and money. The commuting expenses will be reduced for two days a week. Moreover, the individual can rest in their free days and spend time with your family. Rarely are people who work five days a week energetic because they have to commute to work every day and almost there is a traffic jam in the first hours of the day since others are going to work too which makes the commuting to work very exhausting and time-wasting. For instance, I remember the period that I was working at a company in Tehran for five days a week. when I used my car I had to waste many hours in traffic. To get to work on time I had to wake up early and it took me lots of energy. But when I used the metro I didn't have that problem but it was so crowded which made me tired. After returning home, I always was tired and even I could not spend much time with my friend and my family. Had I worked in a company for three days a week, I would not have had such problems and would have more enjoyed my life.
Second, the individual can follow their personal interests if they work just three days a week. On the remained days of the week, you can spend time with your family and your friends. Since it is the half majority of the week you can take a trip and enjoy life. For example, while I went to work five days a week, my friend worked just three days a week and spent the rest of the week boosting his abilities in other areas. He went to horseback riding, tennis, and guitar classes. Moreover, He developed his knowledge in his major and got a promotion.
To sum up, I really prefer to work three days a week because not only will I save money, time, and energy, but I will also enjoy my life and will learn new things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'Rarely' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: Are Rarely
...e days and spend time with your family. Rarely are people who work five days a week energe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...company in Tehran for five days a week. when I used my car I had to waste many hours...
^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...company in Tehran for five days a week. when I used my car I had to waste many hours...
^^^^
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... of energy. But when I used the metro I didnt have that problem but it was so crowded...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
... made me tired. After returning home, I always was tired and even I could not spend much t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, while, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.25862068966 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21076153342 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422413793103 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0996832823 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8181818182 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31818181818 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480881638685 0.236089414692 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159332709339 0.076458572812 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131517651573 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311094884906 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105207956995 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.43 10.9000537634 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.