It is more important for the government to spend money on internet than on transportation.agree or disagree.
By and large, it is established beyond the fact that for the establishment of a successful society, the government supports the communities and provide them with financial aid. In this regard, equal distribution of resources is of paramount importance. Vividly, it is the right of every individual in a society to access those resources. There is no shortage of opinion that whether the government should give importance to transportation, or they should give priority to the internet. if I were asked, I would definitely agree that higher authorities need to spend more on the internet than on transportation. For what follows, I ll delve into most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The most important rationale behind my agreement is rooted in the fact that the internet provides a plethora of information to every individual of the society. To be more specific, students get pieces of information to progress in their education, the adults use them as their recreation activities, the office worker uses that to enhance the efficiencies of their works. There is not a single individual who can not get benefit from the internet except those who really do not want to change their previous circumstances. Not to mention that with all this advancement in society, people get more employment, and hence reduce the crime rates of their community. My opinion on this matter is greatly influenced by my neighboring town example, five years ago before the invention of the internet there, people are lacking in knowledge mostly unemployed and indulge in crimes. But with the advent of the internet their situation turns upside down, people started to get an education online and establish online businesses. Not only it provides them with job opportunities but also reduces the crime rate significantly. It is crystal clear to see why the internet plays an integral role in the development of society.
The second compelling reason to elucidate my standpoint is associated with the issue that transportation addition brings more problems in my society. It is worth mentioning that my town is adapted to the contemporary lifestyle very well. Most of the people prefer to drive their own cars, just students use the public buses for their commute. Even many bus services stopped operating their buses because of lack of people interest in public transport. In these circumstances, it is axiomatic that the provision of this service wouldn’t help the residents. Only a few percent of people would get the benefit, which is unfair as rights should be distributed equally amongst members of society. For the purpose of illustration, yesterday I was watching a show on television where a commentator gets reviews about the same topic. Not surprisingly, more than 90 percent of people were against the provision of transportation service and wanted to have free internet access. Therefore, no need to provide a service that the community does not need.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that the internet holds more value to my society members. For the sake of brevity, few points are reiterating. First, providing internet will result in advancement in society. Second, transportation around the facility is not adequate regarding residents' needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...y should give priority to the internet. if I were asked, I would definitely agree ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, really, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2746.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21062618596 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02703475569 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531309297913 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5681191431 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.703703704 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5185185185 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2962962963 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222782984046 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545412448566 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585822869876 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148612851655 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577785882936 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.