:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that universities and colleges are pushing back the frontiers of knowledge to advance the students in society. In this regard, the selection of the right courses for students is of paramount importance. There is no shortage of debate on whether students should require to take history courses during their degrees or not. If I were asked, I would disagree with the notion that history subjects should not be mandatory for all students' courses. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my stance is associated with the idea that history subject has no practical use, therefore is wastage of time for students. To be more specific, history and archeology studies are just facts and stories of ancestors hence, provide no future job opportunities. For students who do take any interest in history, it is a wastage of time and effort. By the way of illustration, five years ago, when I chose the pharmacy profession, my university required me to take the history class every year. I worked strenuously to memorize all the historical facts and chronological events. Even, I could not pay proper attention to my compulsory subjects because of history's lengthy syllabus. Long story short, I graduated last year and applied for a job in a pharmacy. To my surprise, my job employer was not interested in my history knowledge and did not ask for that in job requirements. I felt like I wasted all my time memorizing that information that has no practical usage. If I had spent that time in my course study, I would have used my time productively.
The second exquisite reason behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that university's education purpose is to help students advance in their society. Since history education is limited to memorizing the facts, it will not help the students to achieve the goal of progress. On the other hand, science subjects are a multidirectional profession that leads the students to success. It is even being said that science of today is the technology of tomorrow. Therefore, it is not necessary to include history subjects in the curriculum for all students. It is worth mentioning that scientists, researchers, medical professionals and, engineers are the product of science studies. As a case in mind, last year, my brother's Engineering university lift the requirement to take history subjects for all students and motivated the pupils to participate in extra research class. it brought a significant difference in department. Last month, few students installed their own energy-efficient solar panels in the whole department. No doubt that's a big success just after a year of making this change.
Lastly, forcing students to take a subject that they don't feel interested in is not the purpose of university education. University students are different from the children, they are independent in their lives and are career-oriented. Forcing them to study a subject that they don't like will create anger and depression in them. They will try to resist the decision and that results in a stressful situation. As a case in mind, last year my cousin's Engineering university announced that now all the students had to take history classes, which were elective before. It filled anger amongst students. They first tried to solve the matter by discussing with professors that they did not think that history would help them in their professional careers. Later on, when their voice was not heard, they started to protest against the university decision and stopped attending the classes. This created a tense atmosphere in university, other students who were not involved in protest felt harassed to go to university. Ultimately, his university had to reconsider the decision of making history a compulsory subject. If the university had not made it mandatory, students would not have caused such trouble.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that the history course should not be beneficial, thus, not be mandatory. For the sake of brevity few points are worth reiterating. First, taking the history course will have no practical use. Second, students should focus on other areas of expertise and science subjects.
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students Discuss these views Which view do you agree with Explai 73
- Life today is much more comfortable than life your parents have lived 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- It is better for people to choose jobs that come with high salaries even though they do not enjoy doing it than to choose jobs that they enjoy but come with low salaries 73
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...the way of illustration, five years ago, when I chose the pharmacy profession, my...
Line 3, column 867, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...to participate in extra research class. it brought a significant difference in dep...
Line 3, column 1027, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...anels in the whole department. No doubt thats a big success just after a year of maki...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, no doubt, by and large, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07874015748 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98609784394 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513779527559 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7425378195 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9655172414 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5172413793 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44827586207 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283552750232 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746496730818 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623203844171 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19942157131 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054810221327 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.