It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. give example and support your answer
Some people are inclined towards the attribute that spending money to improve public transportation as compared to internet access is more important, whereas, others hold the opposite perspective. No one can deny the fact that there are both negative and positive aspects of spending money on internet access. I personally, though, believe that allocating more capital for the upgradation of the internet is a better choice. In the following essay, I intended to put forth my points and reasons for support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the internet is the need of the day. In today’s era, it comes under one of the basic necessities of life because we require the internet for almost everything. To exemplify, nowadays students want internet connection for their online classes. Along with this, when teachers or some high profile professors conduct their seminars, they require a good quality internet. As a result, they can reach more audiences. Moreover, we can also invite international speakers which in turn help our nation to get a sea of knowledge from people around the globe. Therefore, this example illustrates the importance of improving internet access by the government.
Secondly, to explain broadly, I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. Back then, when I was doing my Ph.D, due to some unavoidable circumstances I had to stay in a village for 6 months. Additionally, my supervisor gave me an assignment to be completed in thirty days. I encountered the hardest time of my life because there were no updated internet services available in the village. Moreover, people had to travel to the city in order to access the proper internet. Thus, this experience taught me that the government should spend more capital in improving internet access rather on developing public transportation.
In light of the reasons mentioned above, I strongly believe that having upgraded internet access is more essential as compared to improved transport. Undoubtedly, the internet is now a need of the day from education to connecting our loved ones. Therefore, I recommend considering these reasons before making a choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs hold the opposite perspective. No one can deny the fact that there are both ne...
^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... today’s era, it comes under one of the basic necessities of life because we require the internet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...good quality internet. As a result, they can reach more audiences. Moreover, we c...
^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: D
...ence. Back then, when I was doing my Ph.D, due to some unavoidable circumstances ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2094972067 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96179626809 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4922005846 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332884772973 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932469698933 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983643781725 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2029215945 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779133183341 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.