It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Nowadays, we live in the era of technology and no one can deny the importance of internet in our daily lives and how it makes our lives much easier. People use the internet to work, advertise their products, learn about almost anything, apply to schools, pay bills, and etc.
That's why, in my opinion, I believe that it is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation for a couple of reasons that I will briefly discuss in the following essay.
First, improving internet service can increase job opportunities for people. For instance, if there is a good internet service, a working mother can easily do her work remotely instead of having to quit her job, as she can't leave her kids alone. In this way, more people would be able to apply for jobs and work efficiently remotely. As a result, people would achieve their goals at work and in the same time making more money to support their families.
Second, as I mentioned previously, better internet services increases job opportunities, which will eventually result in an economic development. Imagine the huge number of job opportunities being available online and its influence on taxes! More people working means that more taxes will be paid, and so there will be more money available for the government to spend on renovations and developments in the different fields; for example improving public transportation.
Last but not least, improving internet access can actually solve some of the transportation problems. People won't have to leave their houses frequently. Applying for universities, doing job interviews, taking courses, buying home goods and groceries, and other tasks can be simply done at home. Consequently, there will be less cars on the streets and so, more parking lots will be available and traffic will be less crowded, eventually saving effort, time and money.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize on the importance of improving internet access and this can improve our lives, open new job opportunities and save us money and time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... anything, apply to schools, pay bills, and etc. Thats why, in my opinion, I believe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g, apply to schools, pay bills, and etc. Thats why, in my opinion, I believe that...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ply to schools, pay bills, and etc. Thats why, in my opinion, I believe that it i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...stead of having to quit her job, as she cant leave her kids alone. In this way, more...
^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'cants'.
Suggestion: cants
...stead of having to quit her job, as she cant leave her kids alone. In this way, more...
^^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ving internet access can actually solve some of the transportation problems. People wont ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ne at home. Consequently, there will be less cars on the streets and so, more parkin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, briefly, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12244897959 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84028464963 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565597667638 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3544901823 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397669798538 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136418852945 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151909624194 0.0737576698707 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242022630021 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166867508067 0.0645574589148 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.