It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends
Humans are social animals and so, they need to interact with other humans. Lack of human interaction can lead to chronic depression and many such mental issues. In the current scenario, it is very difficult to find trust worthy and loyal friends. Hence, I agree with the statement that it is important to keep our old friends.
Old friends are the people who we already know, it is easier to open to them and rely on them for emotional support. However, this will not be the case with new friends as we have to spend quality time with them, in order to trust them emotionally. For example, if you have a friend who has been with you from many years and who knows about your family situations and your problems then it is easier to share your problems with him or her rather than with someone who barely knows you and cannot empathize with your problems as your old friend.
The base for any relationship is loyalty. A friend cannot be loyal if he or she gives up their friendship for a new one. Such people will be deemed selfish and untrustworthy. Therefore, a good friend will not give up an old friend in order to accommodate a new one.
The crime rate is rapidly increasing in the world and most of these crimes are done by close acquaintances. Therefore, we should be very vigilant in choosing our friends. Since, an old friend is someone whom we already trusted, there is low risk from that person. Whereas, in making a new friend, we have to careful enough to check his or her background before getting close to him or her.
Although, this does not imply that one cannot make new friends after a certain limit. This will make the person narrow-minded and inflexible. The person should ensure that his or her old friendships are stable before making a new one.
Hence, the above points delineate the reasons why it is important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iend in order to accommodate a new one. The crime rate is rapidly increasing in ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.527696793 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44099420022 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507288629738 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3176956128 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7368421053 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419482796389 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120498041999 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131327665177 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238583684517 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143816618462 0.0645574589148 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.