Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
The increasing disputes in the society are the repercussions of paucity of moral awareness among people. In this technological era, logical reasoning is often given precedence over morality. This can be deleterious to the society as humans are gregarious creatures and the key to the co-existence of myriad population is the innate humanity in them, but if they enumerate humans and treat them like just another living entity then that will prove factious to the society.
Most of the crimes in the world today are precipitated due to some chauvinistic people who attack people based on their religion, race, sex etc. These are the kind of people who want in morality. They are prejudiced and develop anathema for people who qualify those prejudices. This sort of behavior could be corrected at the embryonic stages itself, when people are furnished with the right moral values that can avert these sort of differences among people.
It is easier to teach people when they are younger rather than waiting for them to have an epiphany and redress the hate they disseminated in the society. So, teaching morality should be the foundation of education.
Humans are disparate from machines because of their idiosyncratic quality of morality. Artificial intelligence, the current big thing in the world, is a field that requires a cornucopia of logic. The machines involving artificial intelligence demand a great of deal of logic and they are programmed with a lot of conditions but in spite of being heavily furnished with logical reasoning, it is difficult to teach them moral behavior, something that is innate to humans. Hence, teaching moral should be the foundation of education as teaching with a foundation of logical reasoning holds the peril of turning humans into machines.
Hence, teaching morality should be the foundation of education with good emphasis on logical reasoning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...h the right moral values that can avert these sort of differences among people. It is eas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, then, kind of, sort of, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19672131148 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84065013698 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534426229508 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9458527559 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.214285714 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346692203864 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133084146304 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14558096519 0.0758088955206 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219252663855 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108229103738 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.