It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends.
The prompts says that preserving the old friendships is more crucial than the new ones. I totally agree with the prompt's statement for two significant reasons, which I will discuss in the following essay.
To begin, having friends for a long time, creates a common area where the friends' interests meet. Therefore, no interests' conflict will happen. This is best demonstrated by my personal experience. Last year, I had to move to a new country because my husband's job. Consequently, all the friends that I know have been changed. Thus, I met a new friend and as time passed, we had a good friendship. In the beginning, our relation was good, but after a few months, we discovered that our interests were remarkably different. For instance, my friend usually go out every weekend and asks me to go with her, but I usually prefer to sit at home with my family or even study. This interest contradiction causes plenty of quarrel between us. Quite the opposite, if this situation was with my old friend, we will not quarrel with each other as we understand that every one has his own life-style.
Second, old friends have built a strong relationship which lets friends to excuse each other. For example, If I agreed with one of my old friend to hang out in the weekend, but suddenly I changed my mind. Old friends in such situation have the mentality to excuse because they have lots of situation that proof the good intent of the late person. However, when I late on my new friend, he thought that lateness was unrespect to him, instead of thinking in a good way and execusing me. Therefore, old companions have a long history and situations that are evident for a real love and respect between them.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that keeping old frindships are more important than to create new companions. This is because old friends as time passes, can understand each one's interest, and thus the conflict will be rare. In addition, unexpected situations and a sudden mindset changing will not be interpreted as unhomage, but they will excuse condone. Therefore, I believe to have one old friends for your entire life is more comfortable and essential than to make new friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'say'.
Suggestion: say
The prompts says that preserving the old friendships is ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
... the new ones. I totally agree with the prompts statement for two significant reasons, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun quarrel seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of quarrels'.
Suggestion: plenty of quarrels
...udy. This interest contradiction causes plenty of quarrel between us. Quite the opposite, if this...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun situation seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of situations'.
Suggestion: lots of situations
...e mentality to excuse because they have lots of situation that proof the good intent of the late ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74607329843 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68872636621 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534031413613 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.968592864 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1904761905 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377271451655 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112950229356 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110507941717 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236442100772 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110404581618 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.