In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
The prompt says that in the future there will not be many cars in use like nowadays. Personally, I agree, and I feel this way for two reasons, which I will examine in the following essay.
First of all, to achieve a decrease in car usage, there should be other alternatives means. If we look at the past, there were no any transportations like cars, trains, and airplanes but horses and camels. Therefore, logically to feel this way in the future. As there is massive development and progress in transportation means technology, it is expected to have small flying cars or bicycles. This is best exemplified by current facts, Tesla, the auto-drive cars, a few decades ago, we cannot imagine that one day we have a car that doesn't need a driver; however, here it is. As time passes, they probably invent flying vehicles instead of cars.
Secondly, as there is a global trend to reduce traffic and car's emissions thus, I believe that will be many solutions to reduce the number of cars on the roads. For example, nowadays, in the big cities where the tourists go like Dubai, they do water sports with an invention called a motor flight. This flight pushes up the person to make him fly. Surprisingly, that fly has an excellent public reputation. Thus, now many manufacturers are developing it into a daily commercial vehicle and, consequently, will shrink the car numbers.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that in the future using cars gradually will be minimized. This is because there are many innovative methods regarding the transportations means, and as a corollary, other versions will be used instead. Moreover, as there is a worldwide aim to reduce the detrimental effects of using cars, whether to reduce the traffic or the emissions, that will encourage many manufacturers to reproduce an existent version of an entertaining vehicle into a commercial one. Therefore, based on the above two reasons, the number of cars will diminish.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'alternatives'' or 'alternative's'?
Suggestion: alternatives'; alternative's
...ase in car usage, there should be other alternatives means. If we look at the past, there we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ans. If we look at the past, there were no any transportations like cars, trains, ...
^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...imagine that one day we have a car that doesnt need a driver; however, here it is. As ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transportations'' or 'transportation's'?
Suggestion: transportations'; transportation's
...e many innovative methods regarding the transportations means, and as a corollary, other versio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sons, the number of cars will diminish.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9003021148 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87865473744 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567975830816 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.706451178 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4117647059 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234320124581 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822725066457 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880311027211 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162130406148 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673871762012 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.