It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends.
The prompt says that preserving the old friendships is more crucial than the new ones. I totally agree with the prompt's statement for two significant reasons, which I will discuss in the following essay.
To begin, having friends for a long time, creates a common area where the friends' interests meet. Therefore, no interests conflict will happen. This is best demonstrated by my personal experience. Last year, I had to move to a new country because of my husband's job. Consequently, all my old friends that I know have been changed. Thus, I met a new friend and as time passed, we had a good friendship. In the beginning, our relation was good, but later after a few months, we realized that our interests were remarkably different. For instance, my friend usually goes out every weekend and asks me to go with her, but I usually prefer to sit at home with my family or even study. This interest contradiction causes plenty of quarrel between us. Quite the opposite, if this situation is with my old friend, we will not quarrel with each other as we understand that every one has his own life-style.
Second, old friends have built a strong relationship which lets them to excuse each other. For example, If I agreed with one of my new friend to hang out in the weekend, but suddenly I changed my mind. Old friends in such situation have the mentality to excuse because they have lots of situation that proof the good-intent of the late person. However, my new friend thought that lateness was irrespect to him, instead of thinking in a good way and execusing me. Therefore, old companions have long history and situations that are evident for real love and respect between them.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that keeping old friendships are more important than creating new companions. This is because old friends as time passes, can understand each one's interest, and thus the conflict will be rare. In addition, unexpected situations and a sudden mindset changing will not be interpreted as unhomage, but they will excuse and condone. Therefore, I believe in having one old friends for entire life is more comfortable and essential than making new friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
... the new ones. I totally agree with the prompts statement for two significant reasons, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun quarrel seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of quarrels'.
Suggestion: plenty of quarrels
...udy. This interest contradiction causes plenty of quarrel between us. Quite the opposite, if this...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun situation seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of situations'.
Suggestion: lots of situations
...e mentality to excuse because they have lots of situation that proof the good-intent of the late ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81066666667 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70052636844 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541333333333 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1524668442 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9047619048 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347592280088 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109335312915 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101287889436 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223529866831 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942215551167 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.