Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
A successful leader the one who has the ability to mange the work and workers, and to be able to do so; he needs a good personality and somehow of morals. The prompt says that effective leader although it's important to have a moral judgment, its not important as the leader's ability to create respect of his peers. I strongly agree with this as without this respect he will not able to run the work effectively for two reasons.
First, respect creates a trust, therefore, any leader wants to build a trust in his decesions from his peers should begin with creating such esteem between him and his coleagues or subordinates. For example, if CEO of a company and should take decesions somehow hard in a difficult situation such what happened in 2020 in Coronavirus Pandemic. Most of companies' leaders in that time had to take some crucial decesions such as reducing salaries or even make a termination for the redundant workers; these actions are far away from moral personalities in most of people' mind. However, if this CEO has respect and strong relationship with subordiantes; they will support him and even will contribute to solving this problem with least losses to takerover this hardship time.
Secondly, although moral judgment is important, but Doesn't guarantee creating an excellent leader, as the respect the only tool which warrantyes this. For example, based on the previous example, if the mentioned CEO wants to take a decesion to promote someone in a higher poistion and based only on the morals, in this case, this one's peers will not statisfay about the CEO 's decesion as it not depends on actual skills or qualifications. However, if the CEO decides to choose based on the person personality and his ability to deal with his managers with wisdom and his peers, the one who has an esteem from his peers as he is a good worker, in this case, his choice will be acceptable from all the others. Not to mention, that CEO already has a respect and trust which help him to be trustworthy from his subordiantes.
In conclusion, moral is important for a good leader, but to have an excellent one should have one who has respect of his peers and has a right relationship betwen them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...oral judgment, its not important as the leaders ability to create respect of his peers....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...re far away from moral personalities in most of people mind. However, if this CEO has respect ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...will contribute to solving this problem with least losses to takerover this hardship time....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Doesn't
...though moral judgment is important, but Doesnt guarantee creating an excellent leader,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...based only on the morals, in this case, this ones peers will not statisfay about the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74934725849 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68908716781 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467362924282 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6073688964 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.583333333 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9166666667 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302499620654 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129665252359 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130374847484 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221005412191 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813564528456 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.