There are different opinions on whether people should follow the news presented by people with whom their viewpoints are aligned or those who possess different beliefs from them. Even though some people think watching or reading news presented by people with opposite views gives rise to anger and bad feelings, I believe otherwise, maintaining that the advantages of listening to people with different points of view outweigh its drawbacks. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that people's political, religious, or social penchants are usually not quite objective. They have some bias toward their beliefs, most of which are irrational. These tenets and convictions might have roots in their family or the environment they have been raised. Watching news that is offered by people with a different perspective from what they have helps to think more objectively and see situations from a different perspective. Consequently, they have a chance to amend their views on some issues. Therefore, this reason manifests the importance of watching news rendered by people with different convictions.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that listening to what people with dissimilar beliefs, even utterly conflicting views, say is most of the time so instructive and helps people to broaden their knowledge. In this way, people get the chance to pay attention to more details and become aware of other people's notions. For instance, in my country, there are two main political groups. The first group believes that religion should be implemented in politics, and religion and politics are not separable. On the other hand, the second group does not comply with this notion. Usually, they debate with each other, and some of their debates are broadcasted on TV. Personally, I agree with the second group, but most of the time, I listen more meticulously to the delegate of the first group. If overlooked the first group and its views, I would not have the knowledge I have today. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that listening to people holding conflicting views from ours is crucial and beneficial.
To make a long story short, many people are in favor of listening to news that is presented by those who hold the same viewpoint as they have. Nonetheless, the foregoing points lead us to conclude that listening to the opposite group is more important.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, look, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17257683215 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75655389656 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505910165485 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7960152437 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241926681654 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743562207082 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899026079409 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166235720602 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860719478094 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.