Keeping up-to-date with the latest information is the best way to gain knowledge. Some people prefer to get news from the sources where they get similar views to them, while others prefer to get information from where they get different ideas. In my opinion, I totally agree with the statement that it is better to receive news from people from different views. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will further explore in my essay.
To begin with, news can be provided from opposite views from ones own, it emphasizes unique perspectives, and you get a better understanding from both views, a negative and positive side. To explain broadly, otherwise, from the same attitude of people, they could be biased by overviewing only a single side. My personal experience is a compelling example of it. When I was in college, at that time, there was hot news related to the university's corruption. Therefore, students got news from different sources and discussed cases in the classrooms. Moreover, some of my friends were trying to expose the staff members, and we encouraged other students to join us. However, some students supported the university because they knew its reality. As a result, when we looked up from their views, we realized that we did not understand the whole system by just watching one side of the system. In fact, after that, we supported a group of students trying to protect the university's reputation. If we had not got information from different views, we would not have understood the value of the university. Thus, I can say that it is the best way to improve understanding by viewing both sides of perspectives.
Secondly, contrary to the belief that view from a different side leads to debate, sometimes, discussion can be helpful for learning. To be specific, from the debate, people can learn a lot of new things. For instance, when my cousin was debating over the topic of world pollution, we got additional data by listening to everyone's view. Even though the discussion ended up with a debate, in the end, we had satisfaction in discussing the topic in detail. Thus, I can strongly admit that arguments can be enjoyable by learning new things.
In a nutshell, It is a good idea to get news from different views because you get a deeper understanding of the topic and learn new things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch I will further explore in my essay. To begin with, news can be provided from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by viewing both sides of perspectives. Secondly, contrary to the belief that vi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lead'?
Suggestion: lead
... belief that view from a different side leads to debate, sometimes, discussion can be...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be enjoyable by learning new things. In a nutshell, It is a good idea to get ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding of the topic and learn new things.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.835 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7878262141 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6356812244 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0952380952 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168392529699 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508068873484 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618156699142 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111178706288 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437310082574 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.