It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Being one of the most important way for human to get information, news play a significant role during humans’ lives. Human could learn from trifling things around our neighborhood to international situation over the world. Some people like to read news which state the same idea with them. While others prefer to read different views from them. For my perspective, I would like to do like the latter people. My reasons are two-fold as follow.
For one thing, we could not learning anything from news which state similar opinion with us. I think the most valuable part of the news is the author’s opinion. We could learn the author’s site through the news. If we read the news which has the same idea with ourselves. We cannot see the news in other site. This just like we cannot agree with the knowledge from the textbook. Inside, we should question with textbook. Reading the news with same idea with us would made us being self-important, thus we would not willing to read news with other site. For instance, Tom, my senior high school classmate. He always reads some news which has same opinion. When we talk about these news, he used to have his own opinion. However, he believes that he is always right, he never cares about other opinion. In his mind, there is only two kinds of site, the first one is his site, and the other one is wrong site. Because of this, less and less classmates like to talk with him.
For another, we could make friends with some people who has different views with us. As the old saying goes, without conflict, people could not make friends with others. Usually, statement is the direct way to show a person’s characteristics. To be specific, some people who have absolutely statement often is an arrogant man. Oppositely, some people who could accepted others’ view gladly is a humble man. Take an example about Zhou Yu and Zhuge Liang. Both of them are the famous military division in the Three Kingdoms period. For some event, they used to stated different opinions. When they met and debated to the world’s situation, they became good friends.
One coin has two sides, different sites have their own reasons for existence, we cannot say which site of the news is the best. However, we should read different sites and analyze by ourselves.
On balanced, reading news which has different with us could make us learn others idea, and make friends easily. That is why I prefer to read news with different opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ws which state the same idea with them. While others prefer to read different views f...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
... latter people. My reasons are two-fold as follow. For one thing, we could not learnin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
... follow. For one thing, we could not learning anything from news which state similar ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arn the author’s site through the news. If we read the news which has the same ide...
^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...g the news with same idea with us would made us being self-important, thus we would ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...ch has same opinion. When we talk about these news, he used to have his own opinion. Howev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 934, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun classmates is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s wrong site. Because of this, less and less classmates like to talk with him. Fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75990675991 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39851871342 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475524475524 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8192732953 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.8787878788 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 20.6045352989 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21212121212 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 18.0 4.88709677419 368% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188257244027 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585752153633 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573979376579 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126238351021 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311095317418 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.44 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.