Is job-sharing good for workers?
Job sharing is a type of part-time employment in which one position can be shared by two part-time workers; that is, the two people share the work, hours, and pay of one job.
Job sharing opens more opportunities to people who have other responsibilities, such as taking care of their children or studying, and who need flexible working hours.
The labor market plays a core role in any society by providing people with incomes and others with goods or services. And I believe that job-sharing benefits workers in various ways.
First, having two people working in the same position improves productivity. Most jobs either require physical or intellectual inputs. And providing either of these can be overwhelming if done daily on a long-term scale. But if workers can have someone else share part of the workload, each worker would be able to work for shorter hours. And this allows them to rest more sufficiently, thus be more energetic and, in turn, boost their productivity when they are back at work again. Besides, when two workers share the same work responsibilities, they can pool their experiences together. Doing so enables them to be either more knowledgeable when problems arise while working or avoid many future issues by relying on pooled past experiences. And both of these improve their work efficiency.
Second, job-sharing ultimately improves workers' living standards. Typically, any individual employee works only five times a week with a two-day off every seven days. And this means that many companies would only operate five days a week. However, if two workers can share the same job, they can provide services or sell goods to customers every day, drastically improving their business. With more business comes more revenue. And when a company runs profitably, it will likely offer its employees higher incomes. And this increased monetary reward can allow workers to do many things that they might find unaffordable before, such as paying for expensive part-time tuition at university to further their education or buying a long-wanted car. These expenditures can dramatically improve their satisfaction with their lives.
To conclude, job-sharing allows workers to work more efficiently and improves their living standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[4]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'shares'.
Suggestion: shares
...e. But if workers can have someone else share part of the workload, each worker would...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...many future issues by relying on pooled past experiences. And both of these improve their work e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37209302326 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81080793959 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617940199336 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4588265434 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1052631579 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362763900876 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118365130908 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106457973736 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248546379856 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285769639614 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.