Land: for human needs or for endangered animals?
The earth is now witnessing a controversial issue in the using and saving of land. There is no denying that land use is essential to the development of human society. If no more land is available for people to explore, the living space will no longer endure the pressure from the growth in population. On the other hand, if the land that animals inhabit is invaded by humans, an increasing number will reach the verge of extinction. Thus, the ecological balance will be severely disrupted. Consequently, only through having a good balance between land use and land conservation can such a dilemma be solved.
First of all, land use ensures further development for human society. It involves the management and modification of wild land into areas for human needs. As many as 7 billion people are living on this planet today. To satisfy the most fundamental demand of the growing population, land ought to be properly used. For instance, if there is not enough supply of farming fields, fewer crops can be harvested for food. This will increase the number of starving people in the world. The same is true with land for residential use. No one wishes to witness the rootless existence of those who are not settled down due to the lack of living space. In addition, the construction of commercial districts and public open spaces as well as the creation of industrial parks are all major projects that make a society advance towards a higher level. Evidently, the use of land is of essential importance to the survival of mankind and the advancement of modern society.
Without a doubt, humans should also be on a mission to protect animals from dying out. Endangered species like jaguars, leopards, brown bears, giant pandas and tigers are disappearing at an alarming rate due to the overuse of land and deforestation. Ancient ecosystems are being disturbed during human's excessive exploitations. Such problems have intensified over recent years with unprecedented population growth and urbanization. A thriving and healthy environment is of vital importance to people's well-being, but it is met with potential crisis owing to the extinction of rare animals. The earth where humans survive and develop also belongs to other creatures. If more endangered animals are extinct, humans may face the same danger sooner or later. As valuable inhabitants on this planet, animals, especially those in danger of extinction, should never be deprived of a space to live and thrive. In a sense, saving land for these animals is equal to saving their lives.
Therefore, the government should seek to order and regulate land use in an efficient and ethical way. It is also imperative to make cautious plans to maintain the balance between using and saving land. Meanwhile, assessing the land potential and searching for alternatives for land use are also favorable options for the government. In doing so, the needs of humans can be ensured and natural resources can be safeguarded.
In summary, the harmony between humans and nature is of vital importance in the modern world today. Land management is by no means an easy task. It involves all-round consideration and foresight. Excessive exploitation ought to be strictly prohibited. To use the land cautiously while protecting the endangered animals is a wise choice. Indeed, the far-reaching advancement of a society owes much to a well-balanced social and natural environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, in addition, in summary, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 8.0752688172 421% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2868.0 1977.66487455 145% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11229946524 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90523603423 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 911.7 618.680645161 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.6003584229 170% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4809441606 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9428571429 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0285714286 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409825119816 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946875911228 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100228605891 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240131183654 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063155104424 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 86.8835125448 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.