Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present.
They say that human beings study on the lessons of the past, and one can bring experience from the past into his future. Moreover, someone may indicate that the lack of experience in such areas as medicine, architecture and building is directly related to the past.
For me the previous events are of great value, which can be brought through generations in our future, making the progress more realistic. I believe, that human activities nowadays somehow repeat the “pattern” of our ancestors, because we still try to find out the most effective and reach sources of nutrition by growing advanced plants, we construct buildings, using the knowledge taken from the past. In addition, we do not invent anything new every moment in time, but we actually use our knowledge to improve, for example, the construction characteristics of our houses, or to increase the living age by boosting the medicine practices. We do use the knowledge and experience, developed and gained somewhere in the past.
Furthermore, “knowledge is power”, they say, which implies that people working in such areas as politics feel themselves as a much stronger and a comfortable on the meeting with foreigners. There is a concept of making the visit of foreign colleagues more comfortable in order to strengthen relations between the countries by recreating the traditions from the past, for example, by using national dress or by cooking national dishes for the guests. Similarly, anyone seeking to make foreign friends need to have at leat basic understanding of the culture of the nation of the potential friend.
By the same token, there are a lot of things brought from the past. One of them is the current status of different countries. For example, we know that one country could provide the rest of the world with highly nutritious plant as potatoes, the other country produces the best computers because they have the technology, which became a real through making a substantial research in the past.
In conclusion, we study the world through learning lessons from the past and gain our own experience through making mistakes. Our history is to some extent the driving force behind the progress, however, each individual must nonetheless decide for themselves whether it is still a worthwhile expense.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'seeks'.
Suggestion: seeks
...ishes for the guests. Similarly, anyone seeking to make foreign friends need to have at...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'substantial research'.
Suggestion: substantial research
...ogy, which became a real through making a substantial research in the past. In conclusion, we study...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, similarly, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15733333333 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83640335637 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562666666667 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1200501181 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.45110844103 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139569398446 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492333495455 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319559048353 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796133152242 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102477085664 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'seeks'.
Suggestion: seeks
...ishes for the guests. Similarly, anyone seeking to make foreign friends need to have at...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'substantial research'.
Suggestion: substantial research
...ogy, which became a real through making a substantial research in the past. In conclusion, we study...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, similarly, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15733333333 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83640335637 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562666666667 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1200501181 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.45110844103 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139569398446 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492333495455 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319559048353 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796133152242 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102477085664 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.