Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.
It goes without saying, having a tranquil and convenient life always consider one of the fundamental demands for the human being. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that life in the past is more convenient in comparison to today's life. In contrast, others hold the opposite point of view. Personally, I concur with the idea that nowadays people experience a more pleasant and easier life. I substantiate my point of view as follows.
To commence with, in the contemporary era, Expansion of technology significantly facilitates avenues of accomplishing tasks like communication. To be more specific, technology provides infrastructure like an internet-based platform that amend the world to a more convenient and comfortable place. accessing the internet allows people to establish a connection with other people all over the world every time they want. It is worth mentioning, communication via the internet is fast, safe, and capable of conveying enormous information like pictures and videos. On the contrary, if individuals who lived in the past want to send a message for others, they had to use paper mail which would take a long time to deliver. To take an example, applications like WhatsApp or telegram have copies of users in all countries contacting each other from the longest distance just by utilizing the cellphone and the internet. My own experience is a compelling demonstration of this. When I have migrated to Canada for pursuing my Ph.D., my family lived in Iran. The Internet gave me oppurtunin=ty to contact them every time I want by video call which considerably ameliorates my anxiety and depression after migration.
The second reason that comes into my mind is nowadays medical and health services are available for the majority of people with relatively low cost. It is crystal clear that access to health service with the lowest possible price like medical specialist, the laboratory are one of the pivotal factor increasing public health and affecting on individuals to live easier. In the time that grandparents were children, there were few medical professionals with insufficient, ineffective, and expensive facilities and drugs. Moreover, many diseases were undiagnosed and had no treatment that gave rise to more people to suffer from illness to even die consequently. To exemplify, My grandparents did not survive from cancer. He misdiagnosed for several years due to a deficiency in radiography equipment. Furthermore, when he hospitalized for cancer, there were no efficacious drugs to treat his illness. Have they access to modern imaging technique, his survival would be increased.
To draw a conclusion, I strongly advocate the notion that life today is easier in comparison to the past. This is because not only technology expansion facilitates every aspect of life including communication with others and provide an opportunity to establish communication with others all over the world, but also the availability of healthcare for the majority of people enhances public health and leads to more convenient living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Accessing
... more convenient and comfortable place. accessing the internet allows people to establish...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 912, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'accessed'.
Suggestion: accessed
...s drugs to treat his illness. Have they access to modern imaging technique, his surviv...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.329218107 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11736476012 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 839.7 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8171211274 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.916666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174909929197 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484885381514 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062332257035 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113101628461 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453492553201 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.