In my opinion, if I were the leader of an organization, I would choose to show some sad images to motivate people to take action.
First of all, one important point relates to the emotional aspect. By that I mean, if these sad images contain scenes of floods and raging fires caused by climate change, such details can be visually impressive and stimulating. Once these pictures and videos are graphically presented to the general public, this means that a high-impact message aimed at changing their attitudes will be conveyed, further arousing compassion and sympathy. Naturally, the masses, driven by these heartfelt emotions, will want to lend a helping hand to those in need, ranging from poverty-stricken families to disaster survivors. Consequently, sad images can serve as an effective motivator -- people stand a better chance of taking action more quickly and making meaningful contributions, thus facilitating the process of resolving related problems.
Some may argue that happy images can be reassuring but some potential drawbacks exist (especially when organizations display delighting images too frequently). The reason is simple: happy images typically show that steps are being taken to ease environmental problems and the current situation is getting better and better. As people are frequently exposed to optimistic images of people successfully fighting poverty, the public may feel that these issues are no longer urgent, thus underestimating the magnitude of such matters. Therefore, citizens may not pay special attention to those serious problems like poverty or greenhouse effects. Instead, people from all walks of life may choose to direct their attention and efforts more towards their own assignments or projects. Eventually, the original goal of calling for more action could fail.
All in all, it is my firm conviction that it is a better choice to show sad images to spur people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...videos are graphically presented to the general public, this means that a high-impact message ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...lving related problems. Some may argue that happy images can be reassuring but...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, i mean, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43666666667 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93191580465 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7965223322 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320579800017 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950268453464 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592555743882 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173367392351 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702090511945 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.