Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific examples and reasons for your answers.
Forests are at danger because of the growing population. People need more space for accommodation and agriculture. People try to eliminate forests to fulfill their needs of wood, land, and many more. I believe that forests are a really important natural source that needs to be saved because it provides clean water, air and even habitat for animals. I will elaborate on my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, forests also regulate the natural cycle of water. It helps in evaporation and also attracts could for rain and that lead to a clean drinkable water source in that area. For example, I am from Jamnagar which is located in states of Gujarat, in India. My city used to surround by forests but now it does not have that many forests left. As the city growth happened government removed forests. As a result, after a few years, people started having short of water because of less rain in the city. Not only that but forests also absorb considerable amounts of water from runoff and pass it down into the aquifers, refilling groundwater supplies. So, in Jamnagar city river and lake were dry because of less rain. The result of that agriculture got affected because of dry land and less rain. That is why in Jamnagar now cutting trees is banned and government-organized program to protect remaining forests and encourage to grow trees.
Second, forests themselves represent the life and the revival of living organisms. Therefore, saving the forests at the same time, saving the animals. It is scientifically proved that the elimination of forests leads to the disappearance of many living creatures. Moreover, some of them can become dangerous to people's lives. For instance, Gir jungle is a famous national forest located in the state of Gujarat in India. The primary reason behind protection this forest is to give habitat to the spices of Asian lions which are at endanger. Lions get their natural habitat in this forest because of that since they are living in this forests number of Asian lions increased significantly. In addition, previously lions used to go in villages to find food and habitat for themselves. Now, Gir forest provides natural habitat so lions stopped going into villages. In short, by saving forests, animals also can be saved.
In conclusion, forests are essential because they balance climate, the water cycle, and also provides habitat to thousands of lives. That is why I strongly believe that forests are a natural source that needs to be saved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t does not have that many forests left. As the city growth happened government rem...
^^
Line 3, column 924, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'growing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: growing
...protect remaining forests and encourage to grow trees. Second, forests themselves re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98325358852 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68343535447 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1654287732 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1481481481 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4814814815 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14814814815 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162858373929 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517377093 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554521506797 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124928674975 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418798650028 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.