For many years, we've memorized and verbalized the famous phrase: "The practice, makes the perfect" as a mantra, as a
primitive rule for our years of education. Enrolling in practical classes became more handy, since we were studying by experience, in first person; it's fun. And eventually we felt like studying the theory wasn't a necessity. Learning through our bare hands and what we directly see seemed like it enough base to backup any type of related argument. And therefore this led to universities to consider programs with only practical subjcts. However, I highly disagree with expelling theorical subjects from syllabuses and my reasons are as follows.
To begin with, it's important to keep in mind that it is a necessity to have a theorical base for everything we desire to put into practice. This allow us to understand the "why" and "how" of many phenomenons, and even predict new ones. The biggest scientifics through history proceeded their experiments and discoveries by earlier written legacy, and this information was a theorical backup for them to do what they did.
In the other hand the biggest companies at the very moment they start searching for a new employee, they won't look for professionals in only practical subjects. Companies nowadays are looking for an integral professional who can not only manage practical situations, but theorical information as well. This is a way for companies to make sure that the person they hire can give a high-quality performance no matter the work place this person is assigned to.
Last but not least, studying exclusively practical subjects wouldn't allow students to adapt to the structure of lectures that he may be interested in outside the classroom. This can cause the student to distract easily and don't pay enough attention to the valuable information that is given.
To sum it up, I think it is important to find a balance between the theory and the practice. Both are equally important for the development of the student and future professional and none of them should be taken for granted. Without the theory, the practice wouldn't take place. Without the practice, we wouldn't check the theory. And that is why I disagree with theorical subjects not being taught un universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
For many years, weve memorized and verbalized the famous phr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...akes the perfect' as a mantra, as a primitive rule for our years of educatio...
^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...tually we felt like studying the theory wasnt a necessity. Learning through our bare ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: CAN_BACKUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to back up'?
Suggestion: to back up
...directly see seemed like it enough base to backup any type of related argument. And there...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...studying exclusively practical subjects wouldnt allow students to adapt to the structur...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ause the student to distract easily and dont pay enough attention to the valuable in...
^^^^
Line 10, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...anted. Without the theory, the practice wouldnt take place. Without the practice, we wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...nt take place. Without the practice, we wouldnt check the theory. And that is why I dis...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1528150134 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95585131153 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571045576408 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.991866472 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.157894737 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144755724386 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480697614621 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737157388841 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723680313262 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500473911957 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.