In this set of materials, the reading passage states 3 main reasons why forestry companies in the United States wouldn not decide to adopt an eco-friendly certify on their wooden made products. However, the professor refutes all the reasons made in the article and his reasons are as follows.
To start with, the passage points out how american costumers are used to tons of advertising and publicity claims that they are most likely to reject since they will not trust them. Nevertheless, the lecturer denies this theory as he explais that nowadays the average costumer do not treat advertising in the same way at the moment to buy a product and there is a big chance to get their attention and agreement with verified and international organizations.
Secondly, the reading contends that it is not affordable for the costumer to buy this type of products since their production is more expensive than the nomal wood, causing the final product to be high on price considering the rest of similar products offered in the market. The profofessor argues that costumers sure are interested in paying cheaper prices for their goods, but they only take this extremely in count if the price of a product is more or less than than another.
Lastly, the article shares that United States should not be interested in this type of certify since they are marketing american products for the american market, calling the attention of costumers since it has been a succesful business. Conversely, the professor mentions that United States should be, in fact, worried about foreign competition instead of investing all their attention inside their own country, because its is very attractive for costumers these news products that United States does not produce and offer itself.
In summary, the passage tries to convience the reador through three reasons why it is a good idea for the United States to not to certify and sell ecological wooden products, while the teacher in the reading contradicts these 3 prompst through examples and mentioning consumer behaviour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...forestry companies in the United States wouldnt decide to adopt an eco-friendly certify...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lais that nowadays the average costumer dont treat advertising in the same way at th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: than
... the price of a product is more or less than than another. Lastly, the article shares ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
..., the article shares that United States shouldnt be interested in this type of certify s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ce the reador through three reasons why its a good idea for the United States to no...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, in summary, more or less, to start with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14457831325 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63486566188 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545180722892 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7753622692 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.777777778 110.228320801 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8888888889 21.698381199 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.2222222222 7.06452816374 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0545163336276 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243837662096 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364688887449 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0336776514399 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310427761627 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.3589403974 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.