Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Many people choose to have a pet in their house, whether it was a dog, cat or any other animal. Some individuals become so attached to these animals that they treat them as a member of the family. In my opinion, I believe that establishing a relationship with animals is extremely beneficial. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First and foremost, pets provide emotional support through companionship to their owners. The innocence and purity in their eyes is something that brings pleasure to the entire family. Moreover, the playfulness that some dogs show, for example, when their beloved ones come home, helps their human friends to forget about their stress and responsibilities. I remember my old apartment when my neighbour had a very outgoing black dog. When I used to return back home after a long day at work, this dog used to be very excited and used to jump on my shoulders and run around in joy. This was a big relief for me since I felt accepted and any negative thoughts I had in the back of my head vanished. People who do not have many friends or feel lonely would benefit the most from owning a pet.

Secondly, it has long been believed that animals are not able to feel some human feelings or they are not capable of understanding certain human values. However, many recent studies have illustrated that this conviction is not true. In fact, most animals, especially mammals, share with us the same way of processing emotions. For instance, one experiment conducted on a species of monkeys was able to clarify that animals are familiar with the concept of justice and fairnessa and this was striking for the scientific community. In this study, two animals were given a reward each time they handed researchers a type of token. When the rewards were the same, both animals were satisfied and they did not show any kind of discontent. Nevertheless, when scientists gave the preferred reward to one animal, which was grapes in this case, and offered the less favorable cucumber for the other, the monkey that the researchers discriminated against was furious and had to through the reward in their face. Hence, having a good relationships with animals is important since most animals need care as much as humans do.

To conclude, I am of the view that it's crucial to have a good relationship with our pets since this would bring about health benefits for our family and also animals' brains are very similar to humans and they definitely need the same affection as humans.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...very outgoing black dog. When I used to return back home after a long day at work, this dog...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1024, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relationship'?
Suggestion: relationship
...ard in their face. Hence, having a good relationships with animals is important since most an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tely need the same affection as humans.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, kind of, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63973041292 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2335722184 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228481051393 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722971110251 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595752465681 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155822299519 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756357586793 0.0645574589148 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.