Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many people have a close relationship with their pets. They treat them like their family member. Some people really thought these type of realtionship are not good. But in my opinion such realtionships are good for health. According to science people who have pets leke dogs, cats, birds are more stress free than those who don't have.
First of all, animals dont have feelings but, if treat them well with kindness they always respond in good way. Love for animal helps increase humanity. Moreever animals are always loyal to their owner. They always show their love for their owner. Sometimes they protect their owner. Whenever I see my neighbour with his pet I really like their bond. They feed them, take their pets for walk in park, sometime they take their pet for ride in car, and their pet also always shows his affection towords owner.He play with owner, always follwo his commands, try to help him in many ways. Sometime he entertain owner, It looks funny. But really they share a good bond. And we love to see them together.
Secondly, when we have a pet we have to take care of them. We have to take care of their food, their daily needable things. If we give someone that care and love that animal or person always show their love for us. Pets always teach us how to love unconditional without expecting anything.
As a conclusion, Realtionship with pets like birds, dogs, cats or with other animals are always good for our health. And when we take care of them we also become more responsible, kind person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rds are more stress free than those who dont have. First of all, animals dont h...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stress free than those who dont have. First of all, animals dont have feelings...
^^^^
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o dont have. First of all, animals dont have feelings but, if treat them well w...
^^^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spond in good way. Love for animal helps increase humanity. Moreever animals are ...
^^
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whenever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er. Sometimes they protect their owner. Whenever I see my neighbour with his pet I reall...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...lways shows his affection towords owner.He play with owner, always follwo his comm...
^^
Line 2, column 515, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'plays'.
Suggestion: plays
...ys shows his affection towords owner.He play with owner, always follwo his commands,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 602, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'entertains'.
Suggestion: entertains
...y to help him in many ways. Sometime he entertain owner, It looks funny. But really they ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ond. And we love to see them together. Secondly, when we have a pet we have to ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onditional without expecting anything. As a conclusion, Realtionship with pets ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 269.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66171003717 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19667060071 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520446096654 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8874565626 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.7142857143 100.406767564 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8095238095 20.6045352989 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27205348707 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104275872039 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104938981073 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184093830415 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108283755391 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 58.1214874552 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.1575268817 55% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.86 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.34 8.01818996416 79% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 86.8835125448 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.