In many places, students aged 12-18 are typically taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are usually taught by only one teacher all day long. However, it would also benefit younger students to be taught by several different teachers every day.
It is undeniable that teachers play a vital role in children’s academic and intellectual development. After all, young students rely on their teachers to gain knowledge for success and pursue their interests. Some might argue that one teacher should suffice in order for them to learn all core subjects. However, I believe that they can benefit from having several different teachers every day for two reasons.
To begin with, it is important that a teacher has the expertise and experience needed in order to give his students a high quality education. Most primary school teachers teach every core subject to their students but may only be highly skilled in one or two of those. From my personal experience, I learned that I was lacking in math and science skills in the fourth grade because I was not properly prepared by my third grade teacher who taught every single subject all by herself. Because of this, I fell behind and was not able to build a good foundation in those subjects in order to do well in other grade levels. This clearly depicts that even young learners need a quality education offered by many specialized educators in school rather than learning from one teacher with general knowledge.
Another major consideration is that young students should be able to have the chance to be taught by multiple teachers to build their interests and get a balanced and multifaceted education needed to pursue them. Primary school teachers all have their own interests and biases about certain subjects. For example, if a student is into art and wants to get feedback from his teacher, his teacher may ignore his request and try to sway him towards a different subject preferred by the teacher. This would not happen if the student had a separate teacher for art. This indicates that having different teachers will likely give students the motivation to pursue diverse interests and develop as individuals.
Lastly, one should think about the physical and mental limitations of an individual teacher and the number of students a teacher has to accommodate. Teaching can be extremely demanding with long hours and a heavy workload. For instance, team teaching, especially for subjects like science and math, can be advantageous to both teachers and students. Teachers don't always have to singularly meet the needs of all of their students, and from student’s perspective the good thing about having several teachers is that even if one of them is not very good, the student only has him or her for part of the day. In addition, shuffling from class to class breaks up the monotony. This points to the fact that children would learn better from multiple teachers.
In summary, there are many reasons why young learners should be taught by a variety of teachers in school. This will allow students to have access to a more qualified, diverse, and robust education, giving students the chance to develop and pursue their own interests with the specialized support they deserve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...lieve that they can benefit from having several different teachers every day for two reasons. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to both teachers and students. Teachers dont always have to singularly meet the need...
^^^^
Line 7, column 729, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...s to the fact that children would learn better from multiple teachers. In summary, t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, may, so, third, well, after all, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2506.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.012 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64757927171 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8088123437 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.909090909 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95454545455 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339605814646 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106169672801 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603992401601 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20904949327 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411111392441 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.