In many places, students aged 12-18 are typically taught different subjects by different teachers,
while younger students are usually taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people believe it
would also benefit younger students to be taught by several different teachers every day.
Without a shadow of a doubt, a school's approach plays a pivotal role in individuals' formations, not to mention its tremendous implications on personalities. An unanswered question in this area is that whether young students should have multiple teachers for various subjects. Despite all the arguments asserting that younger students are more vulnerable to unstable conditions and thus should have only one teacher, I believe otherwise, maintaining that providing a number of instructors rather than merely one exerts a beneficial influence on children. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, Children under 12 are readily emotionally attached to the people and environment around them. To put it more simply, a child will usually get used to a particular teacher, which can be bothering when the teacher is changed. Therefore, this annoying situation may impair the child's enthusiasm for continuing school, which in this case, education will invoke unfavorable memories for the kid. On the other hand, when children have different instructors, who they see every day, balance their sentiments. As a result, children become more mature and do not get to be hurt. My personal experience is an excellent example of this. Back in kindergarten, I remember having several teachers for varied topics, including swimming, math, and science. I was aware that after this stage, will be new people teaching me, while a newcomer to that kindergarten was still in the shock of her separation from the last place she was.
Another reason is that hearing different subjects from various people underlies a resourceful mindset. In other words, different people have diverse attitudes, and in this regard, they hold multiple approaches for teaching students. As a matter of fact, young students are in informative years, in which a host of information and thoughts seed the plants of an enterprising mind. In addition, if a child does not understand a specific teaching format of a science teacher, he will not feel incompetent to comprehend lessons because he fully grasps another class. For example, consider a child who finds math a hard curriculum and thinks it is because he is not intelligent enough. However, this child performs great in science class, which is handled by another instructor, thus makes that student feel better.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that young students being taught by varied teachers has substantial benefits in the long run. Not only does encourage juvenile students to get accustomed to emotionally arduous states, but also helps them learn various attitudes and mindsets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35597189696 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90767310844 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8670905988 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.35 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260492274985 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643524517747 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657199888336 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158967399683 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641183307345 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.